Re: Let's talk about what the St. Louis Rams should do
2000 w/Johnson & Small he threw for 3,365yds 21 TD 13 INT
2001 w/Thrash & Pinston he threw for 3233yds 25 TD 12 INT
2002 w/Thrash, Pinkston & Freeman he threw for 2,289 17TD 6 INT (missed 6gms)
2003 w/Thrash, Pinkston & FredEx he threw for 3,216 16 TD 11 INT
He threw over 3,000 yards three times, and twice over 20 TDs and would have done it a third time if not for missing 6 games.
Thats what Mcnabb worked with. I dont want to hear Sam Bradford needs Andre Johnson, Victor Cruz and he'll show us why he went #1, is so great as you claim (primetime). He wasnt accurate last season, but you blame Wrs for that. You blame injuries. No more excuses. If Sam Bradford is as good of a QB you say he is? He can still show it with whatever crop of recievers he has.
Like I said Qbs have produced and showed skill with less talent than their peers. Sam Bradford is no exception. Period.
Re: Let's talk about what the St. Louis Rams should do
Quote:
Originally Posted by -p.tiddy-
QBs benifit from good WRs...and everything else.
That isn't an excuse, that is just the way it is.
I really hope the day comes when people view this as a team sport...smh
Of course its a team sport. You can blame OL. You can blame Wrs. But guess what? You can also blame the QB, and face it Sam didnt look as great as you hyped him up last season. You want to place all that blame everywhere else other than saying Sam didnt do that good of a job last season.
And now for next season you're starting in March. I've seen Sam throw and he wasnt accurate. Overthrew, underthrew. Folded under pressure. But to you? Eh wasnt his fault. OL didnt block, WR didnt get open. Its never his fault. He's a perfect QB. Its everyone else whose imperfect, duh.
Re: Let's talk about what the St. Louis Rams should do
Quote:
Originally Posted by -p.tiddy-
Sam is a good QB who had a lot of things happen to him that weren't in his favor last year.
If you think he sucks you will eventualy be proven wrong.
I dont think he sucks in terms of talent. He sucked last year for various reasons some HIS OWN doing (which you will never admit). I just dont think he is an elite QB talent as he was billed to be. I think he can be a solid QB no question. But when he plays bad, poorly? I'll let you know about it.
If it makes you feel any better I'd take him over Tim Tebow.
Re: Let's talk about what the St. Louis Rams should do
Bradford doesn't suck. He's a solid QB and has the weapons/potential to be a very good QB. But you've made him out to be a future HOFer. That's where most people here disagree and that's why some give you crap on him.
I don't think there's anyone here who thinks Bradford SUCKS. I at least don't. But he's not as good as you make/made him out to be.
Re: Let's talk about what the St. Louis Rams should do
Quote:
Originally Posted by MK2V1GP
Bradford doesn't suck. He's a solid QB and has the weapons/potential to be a very good QB. But you've made him out to be a future HOFer. That's where most people here disagree and that's why some give you crap on him.
I don't think there's anyone here who thinks Bradford SUCKS. I at least don't. But he's not as good as you make/made him out to be.
Re: Let's talk about what the St. Louis Rams should do
They SHOULD be nice and ship Jackson off for not killing himself already after enduring probably more losses than any one player has over 10 years. That guy is class and deserves to be on a contender for the last three or so years he's IN the game.