Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 56
  1. #1
    SexLand Uncle Drew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    The Land of 1 Championship
    Posts
    11,347

    Default Was 73-9 worth it?

    * Assuming they won't come back from 3-1 down.

    Was it really worth it? Instead of resting key players, getting them ready for the playoffs, Kerr ran them into the ground, chasing the record. Records can be broken, but banners hang forever.

    (Legit) Dubs fans: would you rather go 71-11 and win the championship, or go 73-9 lose in the WCF and be remembered as the NBA's New England Patriots?

  2. #2
    NBA Legend Kiddlovesnets's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    16,082

    Default Re: Was 73-9 worth it?

    It was worth it, they could've collapsed much worse if they failed to reach 73 wins.

  3. #3
    NBA Legend RoseCity07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Portland
    Posts
    17,783

    Default Re: Was 73-9 worth it?

    When you're that stacked it's all good.

  4. #4
    Gif-ted bigkingsfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Land of 1 NBA Championship*
    Posts
    18,524

    Default Re: Was 73-9 worth it?

    Quote Originally Posted by Uncle Drew
    (Legit) Dubs fans: would you rather go 71-11 and win the championship, or go 73-9 lose in the WCF and be remembered as the NBA's New England Patriots?
    What kind of question is this?

  5. #5
    NBA Legend FKAri's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    16,620

    Default Re: Was 73-9 worth it?

    "resting" has been proven time and time again to make no difference heading into the postseason. Spurs and Dallas both have had epic post season collapses after "resting" players. The Raptors coming off of b2b 7 game series are tied with the heavily favored Cavs who came off of b2b sweeps.

    Rest is good but GS didn't have to expend much physical energy to get it done. Look at the minutes played. Maybe you could argue it was mentally taxing or whatever. But I would disagree with that as well.

  6. #6
    RENT FREE Spurs m8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    22,969

    Default Re: Was 73-9 worth it?

    73-9 is going to go down as a good laugh in the end.

  7. #7
    NBA All-star NBAGOAT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    North Korea
    Posts
    9,370

    Default Re: Was 73-9 worth it?

    trying too hard in the regular season only hurts if you're playing thibodeau level minutes and you usually get affected by injuries the next season or season after.

  8. #8
    You are amazing SexSymbol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Kaunas, Lithuania
    Posts
    5,918

    Default Re: Was 73-9 worth it?

    It depends on whether Steph still gets injured because of the rest or not.
    If he doesn't, than it's a cakewalk to the finals, if he still does get injured and ruins the momentum and rhythm, that's the same result

  9. #9
    Local High School Star Dr Seuss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    1,528

    Default Re: Was 73-9 worth it?

    so if they went 70-12, they wouldnt be down 3-1?

    stupid justification

  10. #10
    Local High School Star Stringer Bell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    40 Degree Baltimore
    Posts
    1,715

    Default Re: Was 73-9 worth it?

    I don't think it made that much of a difference. Maybe they could be more rested but I don't think they're that tired where it's the difference.

    OKC is just playing really, really well and exploiting the weaknesses that were always there for GSW. They just came off beating a 67-win Spur team. Gotta give them a lot of credit.

  11. #11
    Coach SamuraiSWISH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    13,486

    Default Re: Was 73-9 worth it?

    Quote Originally Posted by SexSymbol
    It depends on whether Steph still gets injured because of the rest or not.
    If he doesn't, than it's a cakewalk to the finals, if he still does get injured and ruins the momentum and rhythm, that's the same result
    Lol cake walk? Thunder just annihilated two overrated teams who went all out in the regular season and stacked wins in a weak league.

    Westbrook is taking a dump on the fraud unanimous MVP worse than anything I've seen before. Yes, worse than any Dirk choke or when prime LeBron and Miami put a straight jacket on the one man 2011 Rose led Bulls team.

    At his own position, no less. A direct competitor.

    And don't give me this excuse like Curry had some major injury. He was back in no time. And played well for a number of games up until he faced Russell. Besides one quarter he has been made into that Ninja Turtles little hoe all series. He's healthy enough to perform in the Portland series or in the 3rd quarter of game 2. Now he's missing layups and free throws. Dude is shook.

  12. #12
    Dunking on everybody in the park BedroomBully's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    609

    Default Re: Was 73-9 worth it?

    That's a hard question to answer. Yes and NO. Yes because they broke the most games won during regular season record, and no because the expectations of a championship were not met! Its a choke job for sure! Regular season does not mean a thing if you do not capture the title.

  13. #13
    Greatest K Xerxes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    3,810

    Default Re: Was 73-9 worth it?

    Quote Originally Posted by SamuraiSWISH
    Lol cake walk? Thunder just annihilated two overrated teams who went all out in the regular season and stacked wins in a weak league.

    Westbrook is taking a dump on the fraud unanimous MVP worse than anything I've seen before. Yes, worse than any Dirk choke or when prime LeBron and Miami put a straight jacket on the one man 2011 Rose led Bulls team.

    At his own position, no less. A direct competitor.

    And don't give me this excuse like Curry had some major injury. He was back in no time. And played well for a number of games up until he faced Russell. Besides one quarter he has been made into that Ninja Turtles little hoe all series. He's healthy enough to perform in the Portland series or in the 3rd quarter of game 2. Now he's missing layups and free throws. Dude is shook.


    Curry (in truth Kobe) stans making pathetic excuses for Westbrook raping curry means jack shit. Curry has to step up these next 3 games and win the series for his team. That's what great players do.

  14. #14
    NBA Legend coin24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Tiny Hateraids Head
    Posts
    17,105

    Default Re: Was 73-9 worth it?

    Quote Originally Posted by Kawhi m8
    73-9 is going to go down as a good laugh in the end.

    This

    I thought they should have been resting guys the last few weeks, not playing 30+ minutes chasing the record..
    Now they look stupid couldn't even make the finals

  15. #15
    NBA lottery pick kamil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    East Brunswick
    Posts
    5,126

    Default Re: Was 73-9 worth it?

    Quote Originally Posted by Uncle Drew
    * Assuming they won't come back from 3-1 down.

    Was it really worth it? Instead of resting key players, getting them ready for the playoffs, Kerr ran them into the ground, chasing the record. Records can be broken, but banners hang forever.

    (Legit) Dubs fans: would you rather go 71-11 and win the championship, or go 73-9 lose in the WCF and be remembered as the NBA's New England Patriots?
    New England Patriots made it to the Superbowl... by the looks of it, GSW isn't even going to make it that far.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •