Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 25
  1. #1
    Lad
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    1,620

    Default UK's parliamentary vote on Syria airstrikes: 397 in favor, 223 against


  2. #2
    NBA Superstar fiddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Hell
    Posts
    14,753

    Default Re: UK's parliamentary vote on Syria airstrikes: 397 in favor, 223 against

    I dont think Assad asked them for help

  3. #3
    3-time NBA All-Star oarabbus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Bay Area
    Posts
    9,788

    Default Re: UK's parliamentary vote on Syria airstrikes: 397 in favor, 223 against

    Airstikes dont do shit. We (the U.S.) have been airstriking for a decade and it hasn't done shit.

    The one that that did anything was sending a SEAL team to kill Bin Laden

  4. #4
    Gambling expert StephHamann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    5,002

    Default Re: UK's parliamentary vote on Syria airstrikes: 397 in favor, 223 against

    I said it already but i will say it again.

    To stop terrorism in Europe, start bombing the suburb of Paris, Marseilles,Brussels,Bradford,Berlin.....

  5. #5
    Out here Pushxx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Cape Cod, MA
    Posts
    5,521

    Default Re: UK's parliamentary vote on Syria airstrikes: 397 in favor, 223 against

    The military industrial complex over the last 7 decades:



    $19 trillion in national debt and $16 trillion missing from The Fed.

    Good job good effort, libs and cons!

  6. #6
    NBA Superstar fiddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Hell
    Posts
    14,753

    Default Re: UK's parliamentary vote on Syria airstrikes: 397 in favor, 223 against

    Quote Originally Posted by StephHamann
    I said it already but i will say it again.

    To stop terrorism in Europe, start bombing the suburb of Paris, Marseilles,Brussels,Bradford,Berlin.....
    And Turkey

    Quote Originally Posted by oarabbus
    Airstikes dont do shit. We (the U.S.) have been airstriking for a decade and it hasn't done shit.

    The one that that did anything was sending a SEAL team to kill Bin Laden
    Dont agree, the U.S. is just pretending to bomb ISIS at the moment, russian came and did more damage in two weeks than the U.S. did in a year

  7. #7
    Extra Cheese LJJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    14,527

    Default Re: UK's parliamentary vote on Syria airstrikes: 397 in favor, 223 against

    The airstrikes from the US led coalition are mainly concerned with trying (and failing) to push Islamic State away from Iraq, away from the Kurds and towards Assad and the Syrian population centers.

    A big part of why their airstrikes have been so ineffective is because they are making sure to not hit any IS infrastructure and weaponry. Hurting IS goes against the goal of the US in Syria, because that makes Assad more powerful. Their airstrikes are essentially road signs: go this way IS.

  8. #8
    NBA sixth man of the year knickballer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    2010 offseason
    Posts
    6,995

    Default Re: UK's parliamentary vote on Syria airstrikes: 397 in favor, 223 against

    Quote Originally Posted by Pushxx
    The military industrial complex over the last 7 decades:



    $19 trillion in national debt and $16 trillion missing from The Fed.

    Good job good effort, libs and cons!
    This

    Propping up moderate rebels and stirring up fake revolutions. War is a profitable game i tell you..

    Assad is going down because he sided with Iran and Russia. If he was hypothetically aligned with Saudi Arabia and the US he would be championed as an angel who protects minorities!

  9. #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    29,312

    Default Re: UK's parliamentary vote on Syria airstrikes: 397 in favor, 223 against

    Will they be supporting ISIS like their NATO allies Turkey?

  10. #10
    College superstar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    4,666

    Default Re: UK's parliamentary vote on Syria airstrikes: 397 in favor, 223 against

    Quote Originally Posted by Nick Young
    Will they be supporting ISIS like their NATO allies Turkey?
    Didn't you guys arm them in the first place?

  11. #11
    Laker Gang #COYG KobesFinger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Birmingham, England
    Posts
    3,901

    Default Re: UK's parliamentary vote on Syria airstrikes: 397 in favor, 223 against

    This will achieve nothing

  12. #12
    Very good NBA starter
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    8,115

    Default Re: UK's parliamentary vote on Syria airstrikes: 397 in favor, 223 against

    Quote Originally Posted by Pushxx
    The military industrial complex over the last 7 decades:



    $19 trillion in national debt and $16 trillion missing from The Fed.

    Good job good effort, libs and cons!
    This will be ignored but it pretty much hits the nail on the head

  13. #13
    NBA Superstar fiddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Hell
    Posts
    14,753

    Default Re: UK's parliamentary vote on Syria airstrikes: 397 in favor, 223 against

    Just read that Syria has received its own S300 complexes and it will shoot at anything that is not coordinated with Damascus popcorn.gif

  14. #14
    Perfectly Calm, Dude KevinNYC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    10,703

    Default Re: UK's parliamentary vote on Syria airstrikes: 397 in favor, 223 against

    Quote Originally Posted by Pushxx
    $16 trillion missing from The Fed.
    Whoever told you this either didn't know what they were talking about or were lying to you.

    I had to google this, because I didn't know what you were talking about. It's about the GAO audit of the FED in 2011. Both Ron Paul and Bernie Sanders were misleading about this because they misunderstood one of the tables in the report.

    There were $16 trillion in total loans, but not $16 trillion at any one time. Large corporations often take out 24 hour loans and then pay them back and borrow the same amount again. This is the Repo market.

    For example, if you borrow $100 from me at 8am every morning and then at 8PM you pay me back $100. Over the course of the year, I've "loaned you $36,500." Of course, I only ever had $100 at risk.

    That's what the $16 trillion represents the total of rolling loans. The amount of maximum money on loan was over 1 trillion, but not 16.

    Further more this money is not missing. It's been paid back with interest and that was known at the time of the 2011 report.

    The table that everyone misunderstand is followed by this graphic which is much clearer.



    The colors are the different Fed programs. The total amount on loan shut up in late 2008 into the first few months of 2009 and then started coming down as banks paid them back in late 2009 and the vast majority of these loans were paid back by Jan 2010.
    Last edited by KevinNYC; 12-03-2015 at 04:02 AM.

  15. #15
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    29,312

    Default Re: UK's parliamentary vote on Syria airstrikes: 397 in favor, 223 against

    UK ain't going to do shit to shorten this conflict, let's be real. Their military is on the same level as Canadas.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •