Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 45 of 45
  1. #31
    Local High School Star Joshumitsu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,699

    Default Re: Why does America get involved in other countries problems..

    Quote Originally Posted by ForeverHeat
    Too young to know about others, but afghanistan no and iraq hell no. Maybe down the line, but not currently. And didn't yall bomb he **** out of Japan? Its doing pretty well now though so i dunno bout that one.
    Average standard of living per person has increased exponentially the past ten-plus years. People have more access to facilities such as hospitals, schools, and transportation. Technology such as cell phones have been introduced and are available to the mass majority of the public. Literacy rates have increased. Life expectancy has increased.

    Statistically, the majority of people in Iraq and Afghanistan want the US and NATO troops to stay. Why? It provides them with protection, job security, and education benefits.

    The problem with how the media presents Afghanistan and Iraq is that they only visit the worst parts of these countries. It's like visiting the Detroit and Oakland ghettos with the prior knowledge of the US only being through crime/action films and murder reports. The result would be that this visitor would think of the US as a gigantic gangland.

    If you venture outside of the battlefield, you'll find the cities full of culture, art, music, etc. One thing the liberals/leftists in the West don't acknowledge is that places like Afghanistan and Iraq are filled with academics, students, women's rights activists, secularists, democrats, etc. Ironically, these leftists/liberals in Afghanistan and Iraq view the US moreso as freedom fighters than invaders with imperialistic agendas.

    To the Afghan/Iraqi people and especially the leftists/democrats/liberals there, it isn't about pushing a Western way of life on them. Instead, it's about providing them with universal human rights. Because if the US leaves, the radical fundamentalist/terrorists will go back to oppressing them.

    The main reason I wouldn't support these wars is because we don't have the resources to fight large unconventional wars such as these, especially as we deal with economic woes. Because ethically, even if we entered illegally, the US is actually doing a good thing by helping the people there.



    As for Japan? They attacked the US first. While I don't condone war in the first place and though they could've targeted more remote locations, the US had every right to bomb Japan. This becomes even more strategic as a mainland invasion would cost both the US and Japan even more lives and resources.


    At the end of the day, however, all these wars and successful nation building are the result of self-interest though. That's neither a good or bad thing as there are both pros and cons to the US's existence.
    Last edited by Joshumitsu; 06-26-2012 at 07:04 PM.

  2. #32
    NBA Superstar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    13,283

    Default Re: Why does America get involved in other countries problems..

    i don't really agree with people saying we're about personal interests so much altho thats an easy/popular answer. despite the overwhelming conspiracy theories that we were after Iraq's oil, we do not have control over it and never will, in fact we haven't benefited at all from it from what i know. i think they're supposed to pay us back for some of the costs of rebuilding with those oil proceeds but that doesn't mean we're making out from it. and we spent billions in Iraq.....even Afghanistan what are we making out on? only thing is chasing terrorists which is what they've said all along. we didn't make out helping Haiti, or Japan either but we have deep pockets to help them and we did....

    if anything our politicians/people are too altruistic, and seem more concerned for people in other countries than our well being domestically. paranoia plays a part too which is the strategic element to us staying in Iraq so Iran doesn't influence too much, as well as Syria i guess, but we're spending a lot of money to help some of these countries without getting much in return that i can see.

  3. #33
    코비=GOAT
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    4,055

    Default Re: Why does America get involved in other countries problems..

    Quote Originally Posted by Godzuki
    i don't really agree with people saying we're about personal interests so much altho thats an easy/popular answer. despite the overwhelming conspiracy theories that we were after Iraq's oil, we do not have control over it and never will, in fact we haven't benefited at all from it from what i know. i think they're supposed to pay us back for some of the costs of rebuilding with those oil proceeds but that doesn't mean we're making out from it. and we spent billions in Iraq.....even Afghanistan what are we making out on? only thing is chasing terrorists which is what they've said all along. we didn't make out helping Haiti, or Japan either but we have deep pockets to help them and we did....

    if anything our politicians/people are too altruistic, and seem more concerned for people in other countries than our well being domestically. paranoia plays a part too which is the strategic element to us staying in Iraq so Iran doesn't influence too much, as well as Syria i guess, but we're spending a lot of money to help some of these countries without getting much in return that i can see.
    Of course there is personal interest. The USA polices the world because it can, it does not mean they have to be fair and impartial. Self interest does not preclude altruism. See Lybia vs Syria.
    This goes to my earlier post, the main reason the US is the world's policeman is that if the UN wants anything to be enforced through military action, only the US can make it happen disregarding the small engagements. Other nations are avoiding responsibility, reducing military expenditures, and expecting the US to pick the slack for world peace. Despite this, the US is well within its rights to interpret these obligations in context with their self interest, but if we attribute altruism and moral imperatives then the US should be applying this ideal universally meaning we should help the Haitians, Indonesians, Lybians, etc. and even the syrians. Does US involvement represent these ideals? No. See once again, US involvement in Libya vs Syria
    Last edited by shlver; 06-26-2012 at 08:01 PM.

  4. #34
    NBA Superstar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    13,283

    Default Re: Why does America get involved in other countries problems..

    Quote Originally Posted by shlver
    Of course there is personal interest. The USA polices the world because it can, it does not mean they have to be fair and impartial. Self interest does not preclude altruism. See Lybia vs Syria.
    This goes to my earlier post, the main reason the US is the world's policeman is that if the UN wants anything to be enforced through military action, only the US can make it happen disregarding the small engagements. Other nations are avoiding responsibility, reducing military expenditures, and expecting the US to pick the slack for world peace. Despite this, the US is well within its rights to interpret these obligations in context with their self interest, but if we attribute altruism and moral imperatives then the US should be applying this ideal universally meaning we should help the Haitians, Indonesians, Lybians, etc. and even the syrians. Does US involvement represent these ideals? No. See once again, US involvement in Libya vs Syria

    i agree with what you said about the UN and how we operate when they fail at resolving issues, but i think the circumstances surrounding Libya were very different than the ones surrounding Syria. we didn't even take the forefront in regards to Libya, if anything we helped other countries that have helped us who had stakes in libya(france?). In regards to Syria its really Russia/China holding us back, and we've been on the forefront of criticizing them for it. altho i do agree our altruism and moral standards aren't universal but all circumstances regarding our help are very different so its not like it can/should be looked at in that way.

  5. #35
    National High School Star sick_brah07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    2,158

    Default Re: Why does America get involved in other countries problems..

    Quote Originally Posted by Nick Young
    Kosovo
    Japan

    Germany


    you have no idea man

  6. #36
    코비=GOAT
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    4,055

    Default Re: Why does America get involved in other countries problems..

    Quote Originally Posted by Godzuki
    i agree with what you said about the UN and how we operate when they fail at resolving issues, but i think the circumstances surrounding Libya were very different than the ones surrounding Syria. we didn't even take the forefront in regards to Libya, if anything we helped other countries that have helped us who had stakes in libya(france?). In regards to Syria its really Russia/China holding us back, and we've been on the forefront of criticizing them for it. altho i do agree our altruism and moral standards aren't universal but all circumstances regarding our help are very different so its not like it can/should be looked at in that way.
    No, Obama tried to get out of the lead role but he couldn't resulting in the US contributing the most funds towards the mission. No it's not just Russia and China. Call me a conspiracy theorist or whatever, but syria has no oil. It's in the middle of the Islamic extremist movement in the middle east meaning it can relocate its military assets to other arab countries. We would even rope in a war with Iran and Hezbollah. Lybia was a civil war, Syria wasn't.

  7. #37
    rank sentamentalist
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    goodbyecruelworld
    Posts
    16,512

    Default Re: Why does America get involved in other countries problems..

    Quote Originally Posted by shlver
    No, Obama tried to get out of the lead role but he couldn't resulting in the US contributing the most funds towards the mission. No it's not just Russia and China. Call me a conspiracy theorist or whatever, but syria has no oil. It's in the middle of the Islamic extremist movement in the middle east meaning it can relocate its military assets to other arab countries. We would even rope in a war with Iran and Hezbollah. Lybia was a civil war, Syria wasn't.
    i'd research syria a wee bit more if you're convinced libya was infighting and syria wasn't. libya was maybe more conveniently divided to allow the west to intervene on behalf of the 'revolutionaries' but syria has as much sectarian malcontent as yemen or afgahanistan or anywhere really. lots of tribal conflict there that is gonna make the resolution messy as f*ck.

    halfway agreed tho on the fact that russian and chinese interest has primarily to do with supporting their iranian allies out of shame for caving last year... not positive about that but it definitely strikes me as a hunch

  8. #38
    Valar Morghulis jamal99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Serbia
    Posts
    4,459

    Default Re: Why does America get involved in other countries problems..

    Quote Originally Posted by Nick Young
    Kosovo

    Japan

    Germany
    Kosovo is not a country. I mean, it kinda is now, but shouldn't be...

  9. #39
    Chasing Legends Kobe 4 The Win's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Staples Center
    Posts
    2,147

    Default Re: Why does America get involved in other countries problems..

    Some people say we have a moral obligation to help our fellow man when they ask for it. Some think we should get involved when some dictator starts commiting genocide. Others believe we should try to stop the spread of communisim or islamic fundamentalism, or whatever. Not I.

    I say if you aren't strong enough or smart enough to keep this shit from happening then you deserve to get wiped out. If you are starving and your entire continent hasn't made any progress in the last 2000 years then tough shit. Survival of the fittest. When we do this stuff the people aren't grateful anyway so what's the point?

    Hippy do-gooders over here are always trying to raise awareness for these causes and bemoaning the religious, policial and economic philosophies that made us successful in the first place. They want to take my tax money to pay for it and send my son half way across the world to do it. Liberals are cowards so they sure as hell aren't going. F**k that shit.

  10. #40
    Sugar. Give me. Sugar. QUIZZLE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Brookyln
    Posts
    2,845

    Default Re: Why does America get involved in other countries problems..

    Gotta love the hypocrisy of other countries right. My roommates here in New Zealand try to egg me on all the time because they know I get hot about it.

    But yet they, wear American brands, use facebook, use iphones, listen to american bands. If you don't like Amurrica don't support anything Amurrican.

  11. #41
    코비=GOAT
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    4,055

    Default Re: Why does America get involved in other countries problems..

    Quote Originally Posted by RidonKs
    i'd research syria a wee bit more if you're convinced libya was infighting and syria wasn't. libya was maybe more conveniently divided to allow the west to intervene on behalf of the 'revolutionaries' but syria has as much sectarian malcontent as yemen or afgahanistan or anywhere really. lots of tribal conflict there that is gonna make the resolution messy as f*ck.

    halfway agreed tho on the fact that russian and chinese interest has primarily to do with supporting their iranian allies out of shame for caving last year... not positive about that but it definitely strikes me as a hunch
    I'll take your word on it, but I was under the impression the situation that the situation UN and Obama was ignoring was the killing of protesters in Damascus? Correct me if I'm wrong.

  12. #42
    Betrayed RaininTwos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    4,154

    Default Re: Why does America get involved in other countries problems..

    Quote Originally Posted by Derka
    Western Europe would have been speaking Russian had we not taken the Western Front.


    The British Empire would have CRUSHED the Russians from every direction imo

  13. #43
    Utryin2getthepipe? SevereUpInHere's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    2,824

    Default Re: Why does America get involved in other countries problems..

    Quote Originally Posted by Kornheiser

    Can someone explain this account to me?

  14. #44
    rank sentamentalist
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    goodbyecruelworld
    Posts
    16,512

    Default Re: Why does America get involved in other countries problems..

    Quote Originally Posted by shlver
    I'll take your word on it, but I was under the impression the situation that the situation UN and Obama was ignoring was the killing of protesters in Damascus? Correct me if I'm wrong.
    that's the most obvious sign of trouble yeah, and it isn't confined to damascus, in fact things have slowed down there of late as state resistance has decided to take most of its fighting/protest smothering techniques away from the big metropolises that can catch international attention. but regardless, the country is so fractured after putting up with the assad's for 30 odd years, it's pretty much incapable of a larger peaceful arrangement. tribal rivalry is unbelievably intense, the fact that 80 or 90% of the country happens to be sunni becomes almost moot.

    tho you're right on other points; a collapse of syria would bode well for the west given that it isn't exactly on the christmas list. gadaffi regardless of what the op says actually became a key ally with bush on the terror war, in spite of the troubled past. assad on the other hand is still on that 'evil western overlord' shit.

    so offering any kind of aid to the protesters/revolutionaries/eclectic mix of folks who happen to hate assad would be a bad idea on the difficulty of transition alone. but it also doesn't make sense strategically because syria still happens to bat for the wrong side.

  15. #45
    NBA Superstar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    14,379

    Default Re: Why does America get involved in other countries problems..

    Quote Originally Posted by ForeverHeat
    .. without actually understanding the situation? And I'm not an american hater or anything, I just think its something that needs to be asked. Whenever there is a conflict in a country, or between two countries, America just runs in either -

    - Helps the guy thats losing, to make themselves look better to the rest of the world.

    - Help the enemies of someone they have been trying to get rid of for awhile (e.g. gaddafi), while simultaneously making this person and their government look as bad as possible.

    - Feed the american people wssith fears and lies until the people insist they go over there and stop these evil guys.

    - Get involved without actually distinguising between the sides and what each stands for.

    - Gets involved in other peoples fights when the needs of americans are right in front of them and being ignored.

    All of the reasons above are up for discussion, btw, if you guys want to disagree. This isn't a patriotism thing, since the english government is just as bad.
    America has a vested ($$$) interest in every country on Earth minus North Korea and Cuba.

    When a country becomes a global player, and they open up their market to the world, it is mainly American interests who invest and profit from these foreign markets (other countries do as well but their share pales in comparison). In many countries foreign interests can own up to 49% of domestic companies, so in a way Americans have a huge stake in every major player in every country.

    When shit happens that stops the flow of goods (most recently oil) or threatens emerging markets, Americans stand to lose a lot of money. When the threat becomes large (Iraq, Afghanistan and now Iran) a war becomes a viable option. To hedge their bets America develops and sells a lot of their old military equipment and technologies so other countries can help in the fight. When they struggle, America will step in. Sometimes the battle is worthwhile or winnable (Iraq) other times the battle gets forgotten because the hill is too steep to climb (Taiwan/China).

    The biggest global player in a global market place has an interest in everyone.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •