Sandy Hook Conspiracy

[miller-time]

Question, what exactly was the conspiracy here? A conspiracy has a specific goal in mind.

What are they achieving by shooting school children?

[MMM]

Question, what exactly was the conspiracy here? A conspiracy has a specific goal in mind.

What are they achieving by shooting school children?

To create a narrative to take guns.

However, that would potentially result in a lot of instability, so much so that it wouldn't make sense for the Government to act in such a manner.

[Magic bird]

Little kids were murdered and you only see it as an interesting way to discuss your conspiracy theories. It's very sad.

This

[D-Rose]

This is nothing short of disgusting...the video has been popping up all over my facebook as the sheep-brained morons of our generation are easily fed this kind of bull shit.

[KevinNYC]

Two Words : Sandy Hook

One more word.: Nudists

[NBA4EVER]

damn it, I saw it yesterday.. I'll see if I can find it again. It's just a picture of Adam Lanza, with his eyes closed wearing a vest of some sort (bulletproof) being walked by several police officers.

i wanna see it

[miller-time]

To create a narrative to take guns.

However, that would potentially result in a lot of instability, so much so that it wouldn't make sense for the Government to act in such a manner.

Wasn't there also some tie in to the Libor scandal? I guess that didn't pan out lol.

[IamRAMBO24]

Kentatm:

You wrote a bunch of jargon that can easily be discounted, but I will zone in on one statement you wrote.

"The Facebook part is also bunk. You can go look at the damn thing. Shooting started about 9:30am. First comments about 3:26pm. https://www.facebook.com/SandyHookRIP A person who didn't know what else to do created the thing in hopes they could help others thats it."

What about the facebook pages on Robbie Parker and Soto ...

Premise: if the pages and comments were posted BEFORE the shootings occurred, then it was safe to assume they MUST'VE have known such a shooting might occur.

I'm only using logic. Try to disprove it. Thanks.

[kentatm]

Next, the BS with the websites and their creation date. There are numerous website out there showing that if you simply edit a video clip or another prior site it will still show the original creation date instead of the date it was changed to content related to Sandy Hook. Everyone one of the site creators have said this exactly what happened. They created various other sites unrelated to Sandy Hook, edited them to raise funds/discuss Sandy Hook after the disaster, and that the creation dates still relate to the original creation dates. Some of the sites were actually "created" in 2006 if you believe the claim they were fabricated prior to the shooting. That seems like a long time to plan the shooting.

and again, the video author is selectively editing for his own purposes.


now go ahead and discount everything else while you're at it.

[IamRAMBO24]

and again, the video author is selectively editing for his own purposes.


now go ahead and discount everything else while you're at it.

You have failed to stick to the premise and created your own straw, so let me remind you of the premise again:

What about the Robbie Parker postings and Soto facebook page. If such postings and page were created before the shooting, wouldn't it be safe to assume they knew the shootings would occur before it did.

Simple logic.

Now stop dodging the premise.

[kentatm]

because they didnt happen in the timeframe the youtuber is claiming brah




oh shit! conspiracies before the event even happened! spooky!

[IamRAMBO24]

Dodging the premise again.

Whatever dude.

You're full of sh*t.

[kentatm]

yea ok.

I think getting called full of shit by one of the most full of shit posters on this site is great.

[kentatm]

and since you didnt read my explanation in the first place, I decided to be an ass

[IamRAMBO24]

yea ok.

I think getting called full of shit by one of the most full of shit posters on this site is great.

Another logical fallacy: ad hoc (the idea that if you can’t attack the argument, attack the character aka "character assassination.")

This is why I am calling you full of sh*t: all your arguments are based on fallacies.

Let's get back to the original premise I proposed:

What about the facebook postings of Robbie Parker and the page of Soto. If such a page was created prior to the death of Soto and a posting was made prior to the death of Parker's daughter, then was it safe to assume they knew of the shooting prior to it happening.

Now stop strawing your a*s around that and be honest for once. Thanks.
Stop being such a d*ck by curtailing the premise and answer this basic logical question.