-
All-time NBA team rankings, 1 - 1,485 unveiled today
According to the Elo rating system. From fivethirtyeight.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/...ording-to-elo/
Here's the top 10:
1 '95-96 Chicago Bulls
2 '96-97 Chicago Bulls
3 '85-86 Boston Celtics
4 '14-15 Golden State Warriors
5 '08-09 Los Angeles Lakers
6 '91-92 Chicago Bulls
7 '97-98 Chicago Bulls
8 '90-91 Chicago Bulls
9 '88-89 Detroit Pistons
10 '82-83 Philadelphia 76ers
-
Embiid > Jokic
Re: All-time NBA team rankings, 1 - 1,485 unveiled today
Originally Posted by jayfan
According to the Elo rating system. From fivethirtyeight.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/...ording-to-elo/
Here's the top 10:
1 '95-96 Chicago Bulls
2 '96-97 Chicago Bulls
3 '85-86 Boston Celtics
4 '14-15 Golden State Warriors
5 '08-09 Los Angeles Lakers
6 '91-92 Chicago Bulls
7 '97-98 Chicago Bulls
8 '90-91 Chicago Bulls
9 '88-89 Detroit Pistons
10 '82-83 Philadelphia 76ers
at them being top 5 all time. They aren't even close to top 10 all time
-
The Chosen King
Re: All-time NBA team rankings, 1 - 1,485 unveiled today
3peat Lakers are that low? '87 Lakers?
-
NBA rookie of the year
Re: All-time NBA team rankings, 1 - 1,485 unveiled today
Originally Posted by SouBeachTalents
at them being top 5 all time. They aren't even close to top 10 all time
Someone sounds shook a Kobe led Team is Top 5 all time.
01 Lakers were obviously better.
-
Embiid > Jokic
Re: All-time NBA team rankings, 1 - 1,485 unveiled today
Originally Posted by HOoopCityJones
Someone sounds shook a Kobe led Team is Top 5 all time.
01 Lakers were obviously better.
Bro, you honestly think that team is top 5 all time? '00 & '01 Lakers are clearly better
-
Re: All-time NBA team rankings, 1 - 1,485 unveiled today
Yeah, not sure what all goes into the Elo rating equation. The article explains it, but I haven't really read it yet.
.
-
Bran Fam Member
Re: All-time NBA team rankings, 1 - 1,485 unveiled today
Originally Posted by SouBeachTalents
at them being top 5 all time. They aren't even close to top 10 all time
00-01 Lakers should be in their place. The way Shaq and Kobe were playing in the Playoffs, I don't think many teams in NBA history would stand a chance.
Originally Posted by HOoopCityJones
Someone sounds shook a Kobe led Team is Top 5 all time.
01 Lakers were obviously better.
Kobe led the 01 Lakers in winshares in the Playoffs and him averaging 32/7/6 during that 11-win streak with 9.7 points on above 50% shooting in 4th quarters made them that great though. Shaq for once wasn't the best player in the world during that amazing stretch.
Last edited by ImKobe; 05-22-2015 at 02:56 PM.
-
Lord Olajuwon
Re: All-time NBA team rankings, 1 - 1,485 unveiled today
I wish I could watch 01 Lakers vs 15 Warriors
-
Re: All-time NBA team rankings, 1 - 1,485 unveiled today
Wait
.....
So kobe lead the 09 lakers to being one of the top 5 rankings ever with only having
-6ppg benched bynum
-worst starting pg ever for a title team derek fisher
-no allstar selections ever crack head odom
-0-16 as leader top 90 all time according to HOF monitor pau gasol as his 2nd option
- sasha
- farmar
?????????
Ummmmm
Wtf lmfao
-
NBA Legend
Re: All-time NBA team rankings, 1 - 1,485 unveiled today
'67 Sixers and '72 Lakers would wipe the floor with most of those teams did they give this an arbitrary cut off or something?
-
Lebron fan
Re: All-time NBA team rankings, 1 - 1,485 unveiled today
lol 08-09 lakers.
-
Banned
Re: All-time NBA team rankings, 1 - 1,485 unveiled today
13-14 Spurs should Be. Top 5
Most innovative exciting offense ever seen
-
Re: All-time NBA team rankings, 1 - 1,485 unveiled today
'09 Lakers?
F*ck off.
-
High School Starter
Re: All-time NBA team rankings, 1 - 1,485 unveiled today
Originally Posted by Dr Hawk
I wish I could watch 01 Lakers vs 15 Warriors
If the 15 Rockets lost to the Warriors by 1 in Golden State, the Lakers would son them.
Just lol'ed at the thought of Shaq playing the 15 warriors.
-
Born again Cavs fan
Re: All-time NBA team rankings, 1 - 1,485 unveiled today
Originally Posted by Raymone
3peat Lakers are that low? '87 Lakers?
those teams were insanely top heavy. so the fact that they are not on this list means this list is probably using some kind of average talent system. im guessing
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|