Page 14 of 22 FirstFirst ... 411121314151617 ... LastLast
Results 196 to 210 of 321
  1. #196
    Wuddup Doe Callystarr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Philly
    Posts
    741

    Default Re: Barkley: I'm better than Malone

    Quote Originally Posted by Shep
    karl malone vs charles barkley head to head in the regular season:

    malone: 23.7ppg, 10.1rpg 3.2apg, 1.3spg, 0.8bpg, 3.0topg, 52%fg
    barkley: 18.4ppg, 10.1rpg, 3.8apg, 1.4spg, 0.5bpg, 3.2topg, 47%fg

    malone: 23 wins
    barkley: 16 wins

    karl malone vs charles barkley head to head in the playoffs:

    malone: 24.3ppg, 11.7rpg, 2.2apg, 1.4spg, 1.3bpg, 2.9topg, 44%fg
    barkley: 13.3ppg, 8.7rpg, 2.7apg, 1.0spg, 0.3bpg, 2.3topg, 45%fg

    malone: 6 wins
    barkley: 4 wins
    This is what matters, when the two meet head to head....and looks like Malone has a pretty safe lead..

  2. #197
    Very good NBA starter Round Mound's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    8,397

    Default Re: Barkley: I'm better than Malone

    Quote Originally Posted by Callystarr
    This is what matters, when the two meet head to head....and looks like Malone has a pretty safe lead..


    Do The Stats When Barkley was Still with the Suns from 1985-86 to 1994-95 and Barkley Out Plays Malone. Even tight till 1995-96.

    It Wasn`t thill the 1995-96 that Malone Outplayed Barkley in Their Last Meetings When Barkley Left to Houston as 2nd or 3rd Option

    So for [COLOR="Blue"]70%[/COLOR] of Their Meetings...Barkley Outplays Malone

    For [COLOR="Red"]30%[/COLOR] of Their Last Meetings Malone Outplays Barkley.

    http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/sho...d.php?t=236157

    In General Barkley was Better than Malone from 1985 to 1995:

    Head to Head: from 85-95
    Higher PER Top 9 and 10 All Time
    Higher EFF Top 10 All Time
    Higher Plus/Minus (+/-) Top 5 All Time
    Higher WS
    Highe OWS
    Higher WS Per 48 Minutes (Top 8 All Time) etc

    Its Very Simple:

    - For Kiddos that Saw the NBA from 1996 on...Malone > Barkley
    - For Elderes Who Saw Them Play in Their Primes...Barkley > Malone
    Last edited by Round Mound; 08-22-2012 at 10:06 PM.

  3. #198
    High School Starter
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    818

    Default Re: Barkley: I'm better than Malone

    Watch out ya gonna get the but barkley was a role player after his injury lecture lol

  4. #199
    High School Starter
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    818

    Default Re: Barkley: I'm better than Malone

    Geez your quick, id like to see their h2h stats from 85-86 to 95-96 even though thats not malones prime (94-95 to 00-01)

  5. #200
    7-time NBA All-Star
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    12,355

    Default Re: Barkley: I'm better than Malone

    Quote Originally Posted by Callystarr
    This is what matters, when the two meet head to head....and looks like Malone has a pretty safe lead..
    Head to head stats are what matter? You really think a few games a year matter more than an entire 82 game season?

    That doesn't make any sense...at all. All head to head stats show is how players MAY have matched up individually. It tells you more about match ups, not who was better. A player may struggle more against a role player than a superstar because that particular role player may be more suited to guard that player than the superstar.

    But beyond that, it tells you more about how a player fares against a team because we can't forget that players are usually doubled, particularly Barkley who was arguably one of the 3 most double teamed players of the past 20-25 years along with Hakeem and Shaq.

    Beyond that, nobody should EVER use head to head stats to try to prove anything unless they've seen EVERY one of those games because unless you do, you do not know how often these players guarded each other. Just because 2 stars are listed at the same position, does not mean they were the primary defenders against each other at all times. I remember entire games when Barkley and Malone weren't the primary defenders on each other.

    And the bottom line is how a player fares against the entire league on average is how they should be judged, not how they fare against 1 player.



    Quote Originally Posted by joeyjoejoe
    Geez your quick, id like to see their h2h stats from 85-86 to 95-96 even though thats not malones prime (94-95 to 00-01)
    You could argue that Malone's prime started in the late 80's or early 90's. You could argue it lasted until 2000, imo, but I think 2001 is pushing it.

    Malone was definitely in his prime by '94, he had become the excellent post defender, a great passer, a consistent shooter and he basically had the same post game as he did when Utah went to back to back finals.

    But Barkley's prime obviously wasn't that whole stretch from '86-'96 either. It was probably from '88-'93, maybe it started in '89, but I usually say '88.He was arguably as good as he ever was in '93, but that also happened to be his last prime season.
    Last edited by ShaqAttack3234; 08-22-2012 at 10:14 PM.

  6. #201
    Very good NBA starter Round Mound's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    8,397

    Default Re: Barkley: I'm better than Malone

    Quote Originally Posted by joeyjoejoe
    Geez your quick, id like to see their h2h stats from 85-86 to 95-96 even though thats not malones prime (94-95 to 00-01)
    Ages 23-32

    http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/sho...d.php?t=236157

    So U are Saying Malone Was Better from 1996 to 2003 age 32-39 or 40?

    He Managed to Stay Healthier But He Wasn`t th Dominant Player He Was from 1985 to 1995 ages 22-31. Not Even Close
    .

  7. #202
    Very good NBA starter Round Mound's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    8,397

    Default Re: Barkley: I'm better than Malone

    [B]Not Only Did Barkley Outplay Karl Malone for 70% of Their Total 100% Head to Head Match Ups When HEALTHY and BOTH in Their PRIMES but he was [COLOR="Blue"]THE TOTAL BETTER PLAYER[/COLOR]

    HEALTHY PRIME BARKLEY (before back and knee injuries) VS HEALTHY PRIME MALONE 1985-1985: ages 22-31

    [COLOR="DarkRed"]PLAYER COMPARISON:[/COLOR]

    [COLOR="Blue"]Barkley[/COLOR]

    [COLOR="Blue"]37 MPG (Playing Less Minutes)

    22.7 PPG (14,6 FGAs PG only) on 55.5% FG (Way More Effective Scorer!)

    11,3 RPG (More!)
    3.8 APG (More!)
    1.6 SPG (More!)
    0.9 BPG (More!)[/COLOR]
    3.2 TOVs PG [COLOR="DarkRed"](Ofcourse! He Didn

  8. #203
    High School Starter
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    818

    Default Re: Barkley: I'm better than Malone

    Ok what i got from that is barkley had better steals, assists, rebounds and more eff, malone scored more blocked more shots and had less turnovers all in all very close and thats with barkleys whole prime and not malones

  9. #204
    Very good NBA starter Round Mound's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    8,397

    Default Re: Barkley: I'm better than Malone

    Quote Originally Posted by joeyjoejoe
    Ok what i got from that is barkley had better steals, assists, rebounds and more eff, malone scored more blocked more shots and had less turnovers all in all very close and thats with barkleys whole prime and not malones
    That is including 1995-96 which is the year that Malone took Over. NEVER BEFORE.

    What are you saying Kiddo...Barkley a Better FT SHooter than Malone cause of the Matchups? Malone was Better FT Shooter He Worked Harder (less talent) for Those.

    Ofcourse Barkley had more Turnovers...You Know He Had To CREATE for the Sixers to and WAS WAY MORE DOUBLED than Malone who did not develop a decent post game till around 1997. Unlike Malone Who Had to CREATE NOTHING for HIM OR HIS TEMATES because of a man called JOHN STOCKTON WHO RAN THE PLAY-S FOR MALONE to Score. THE GREATEST CREATOR AND PASSER EVER.

    Also Barkley shot 55% FG in the 2-Point Region while Malone shot 50%. That is 5% More a Difference Between a Player Shooting 45% to 50%. Thats alot. Especially at PF.

    Malone took 3-4 More Shots Per Game too while Being Less Effective too.

    Do the stats from 1985-96 to 1994-95 the Season (i included the 95-96 season when Barkley was done and Malone was Better) When Barkley got Back Injured and Those Favor Barkley.

    Also Head to Heads Don`t Mean Much because You Don`t Know Who Guarded Who all Time. The only thing i can say is that before 1995-96 when they Guarded Each Other Barkley Schooled him.

    Barkley before Back Injured and ****ing his Knee Up in 1996-97 WAS A MUCH BETTER TOTAL PLAYER THAN MALONE. I SAW IT LIVE in the 80s and early-mid 90s

    Also Look Up On What I Put in PLAYER COMPARISON ages 22-31

    And that is EXCLUDING PLAY-OFF NUMBERS. PLAY-OFFS: WHERE MALONE ALWAYS DECLINED HEAVILY COMPARED TO BARKLEY
    Last edited by Round Mound; 08-22-2012 at 11:11 PM.

  10. #205
    High School Starter
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    818

    Default Re: Barkley: I'm better than Malone

    You wrote more blocks but thats not the case, can cherry pick all you want hey i can do the same imagine comparing the stats in malones prime 94-00 think we know how that would go, malones game took time to polish he worked hard on it something barkley lacked, i never brought up the h2h stats your the one posting the statsheet
    Last edited by joeyjoejoe; 08-23-2012 at 01:26 AM.

  11. #206
    Very good NBA starter Round Mound's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    8,397

    Default Re: Barkley: I'm better than Malone

    Quote Originally Posted by joeyjoejoe
    You wrote more blocks but thats not the case, can cherry pick all you want hey i can do the same imagine comparing the stats in malones prime 94-00 think we know how that would go, malones game took time to polish he worked hard on it something barkley lacked, i never brought up the h2h stats your the one posting the statsheet


    Still you Avoid the fact Barkley outplayed him for 70% of Career While Malone Outplayed Barkley Only 30% Of It = When Charles Left to Houston as an Injured Overweight 2nd and 3rd Option,

    Also You Avoid the Player Comparisson Where Clearly Barkley Was Better for 10-11 Years While Malone for the Last 5 Years of Barkley`s Houston Era.
    Last edited by Round Mound; 08-23-2012 at 02:23 AM.

  12. #207
    High School Starter
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    818

    Default Re: Barkley: I'm better than Malone

    10 or 11 years? 85-86, 86-87, 87-88, 88-89, 89-90,90-91,91-92, 93-94 thats 8 years ofcourse your gonna argue but 94-95 is the last year, i disagree

  13. #208
    Very good NBA starter Round Mound's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    8,397

    Default Re: Barkley: I'm better than Malone

    Quote Originally Posted by joeyjoejoe
    10 or 11 years? 85-86, 86-87, 87-88, 88-89, 89-90,90-91,91-92, 93-94 thats 8 years ofcourse your gonna argue but 94-95 is the last year, i disagree


    Barkley had a Higher PER in 1994-95 and ALWAYS a Higher PER in the Play-Offs...ALLWAYS.

    I included 1995-96 for those head to head stats and thats the Year When Barkley began to Decline Heavily so its 1985-86 to 1995-96. So its 10 Years

    For the Player Comparisson i used 1985-86 to 1994-95 if you add 1995-96 Barkley still has a Higher PER, EFF, Plus/Minus, WS, OWS and WS Per 48 Minutes. Do it Yourself and See.
    Last edited by Round Mound; 08-23-2012 at 09:05 AM.

  14. #209
    High School Starter
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    818

    Default Re: Barkley: I'm better than Malone

    Ok so were just talking h2h then well it seems they were very close in your stats , your avoiding the fact that your cherry picking years prime barkley and pre prime malone

  15. #210
    Very good NBA starter Round Mound's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    8,397

    Default Re: Barkley: I'm better than Malone

    Quote Originally Posted by joeyjoejoe
    Ok so were just talking h2h then well it seems they were very close in your stats , your avoiding the fact that your cherry picking years prime barkley and pre prime malone
    So You Say Malone was Better ages 33-40? Than 22-32?

    I Think He Just Kept a Good Level Cause of His Work Ethic Physically But He Wasn`t Better after that He Just Aged Well In a Good Level Passed His Prime...

    Malone was More Scary ages 22-32 because of his Mobility and For Barkley He Was Just Insane in his Prime Years

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •