Davis+Lee for Granger+Dalembert

[zass]

H2H 16 teams, 9 cats, pg/sg/sf/pf/c/u/u

the full roster of my team is

PG Andre Miller (Phi - PG)
SG Danny Granger (Ind - SG,SF)
SF Shawn Marion (Mia - SF,PF)
PF Ron Artest (Hou - SF,PF)
C Luis Scola (Hou - PF,C)
Util Antonio Daniels(LAC - PG)
Util Kendrick Perkins (Bos - C)
BN Samuel Dalembert (Phi - C)
BN Daniel Gibson (Cle - PG,SG)
BN Mike Bibby (Atl - PG)
BN Etan Thomas (Was - PF,C)


will this trade bring me upsides? that Davis is Baron btw
thanks

[fuzzwuzz24]

maybe just granger but you may be giving up too much unless you would just dump dalembert anyway

[bdreason]

Don't do it.

[RapsFan]

Well, you'd never dump Dalembert in a 16 team league.

I don't think you can do this deal. Baron is risky, and I think you need Dal's blks. In a league that big, having even one decent C who blks would be rare. Granger could also end up being the highest ranked in the deal (although it is somewhat overrated in fantasy).

[benJAMin]

I'd say no. I agree with the idea of upgrading at PG, but really in a 16 team league, Andre and Bibby are going to keep you competitive at least. Plus, you already have David Lee clones in Perkins, Scola and Etan, in that they offer fg% and boards but no blocks. Dalembert is too important to your team to not get any blocks back.

What cats are you looking to gain in right now?

[orangedays]

You're nuts if you do this - Dalembert is a lock for 10-10-2 a night provided he stays healthy and Granger is putting up better numbers already than that walking injury risk B-Diddy. Pass.

[zass]

Thanks for the inputs all, i rejected the trade and avoid being nuts

follow up question on fixing my assist problem

Is waiver Luke ridnour, who had a rediculous game today, at #3 (out of 16) too luxury?
Or should i go with Lowry/DJ Augustin without giving up my waiver position?