Originally Posted by ljsbb27
Obviously Kirk isn't perfect, but he's one of the better backups in the league with all things considered. He brings a lot to the table.
Brooks to me actually is more frustrating to watch. I love how he's a spark offensively and he can quickly get some points on the board while creating for himself, but his defense is pretty bad and he doesn't do much in getting the rest of the second unit involved.
I like the mix of both Kirk and Brooks, but both are frustrating at times.
As Rose gets limitations removed and gets back to playing more of a complete game though both of these guys will play less.
If only Kirk has the shooting accuracy and speed of Brooks, he would be an all-star
Most fans would be impressed by Brooks ability to score, but like Nate Rob, he lacks the ability to read defenses, court vision and doing the common things like entry passes etc. He's perfect role should be like a spark plug off the bench, or even playing along side Kirk who can cover other shorter SGs.