I've seen you make this thread like 50 times and even in the off court lounge chill the f out. I thought Lowry was a good pickup, I had to read scouting reports before I actually thought it was an upgrade jesus chill out.
I've seen you make this thread like 50 times and even in the off court lounge chill the f out. I thought Lowry was a good pickup, I had to read scouting reports before I actually thought it was an upgrade jesus chill out.
I've made this thread twice. Once by mistake in the OTC.
You need to chill the f*ck out and stop paying such close attention.
wtf r u talking about? reading comprehension not one of your strong suits.
Stop whining about how Rocket fans were mad about getting Kyle Lowry. Is that clear? All I am saying is stuff like this happens to all 30 teams. But clearly you decide to whine and say ooooh. How you feel about Lowry now. with 50 of the same threads.
Stop whining about how Rocket fans were mad about getting Kyle Lowry. Is that clear? All I am saying is stuff like this happens to all 30 teams. But clearly you decide to whine and say ooooh. How you feel about Lowry now. with 50 of the same threads.
Stop whining about how Rocket fans were mad about getting Kyle Lowry. Is that clear? All I am saying is stuff like this happens to all 30 teams. But clearly you decide to whine and say ooooh. How you feel about Lowry now. with 50 of the same threads.
He was just trying to preface his point with a real-life observation of fan behavior. There are worse ways to go about opening a discussion...
Probally should start over Brooks. I like his defense he brings and hes slashing ability. They should split minutes though. Brooks makes clutch shots and uses the screens well.
60% Lowry > Brooks, should start and let Brooks come off as the energy shooter much like Bobby Jackson last year.
20% Brooks > Lowry, Brooks is a better shooter and is the next coming of Tony Parker.
20% They both suck, we need to trade for B-Diddy, Miller, Nash, AI, Billups, Hinrich, etc
Hinrich on Houston would be nice...everyone else except for Billups, not so much. Houston's good at grinding it out in the half-court, and all of the other pgs are better in up-tempo offenses.
But yeah, Lowry is nice. He's a fantastic defender with a good head on his shoulders. I still kind of like Brooks starting since the starting line up still has trouble scoring, especially in transition, but I could go either way.
It looks like this could end up like the Charlie Ward vs. Chris Childs debate of the 90s. Once one starts over the other the fans will start screaming to reverse it.
It looks like this could end up like the Charlie Ward vs. Chris Childs debate of the 90s. Once one starts over the other the fans will start screaming to reverse it.
Yeah, especially since both players are evaluated in completely different ways, since Lowry's value is primarily based on the intangibles and defense he brings to the team, whereas Brooks is a scorer.
Re: Kyle Lowry
