You want to get rid of Walsh because he thinks twice before he does anything. Something that Isiah is incapable of doing. Lmao @ calling me stupid when you're the guy who thinks that Iverson will turn this franchise around. You're literally the dumbest Knicks fan on this board.
think twice about what? what is there to lose? tell me i'm not seeing it
We're not talkiing about the Rockets here and it might ruin a good thing they have going. We're talkiing about one of the worst teams in the NBA with very little talent any 5 playing D really respects at all.
That’s some b/s ..i cant see him in miami if that is the case..there will be too much conflict with him and Chalmers …and he could complain about touches seeing it's wade's team…New York was a perfect situation for him…them or bobcats(prior to the S-Jax trade).Who knows what will happen now. ..orlando will be pointless for Iverson to share min's with Pietrus and Vince..not gonna happen! Iverson and Van Gundy getting along???Are u kidding me lol
think twice about what? what is there to lose? tell me i'm not seeing it
We're not talkiing about the Rockets here and it might ruin a good thing they have going. We're talkiing about one of the worst teams in the NBA with very little talent any 5 playing D really respects at all.
Think outside the box for a moment. The Knicks lack a "superstar" or a "go to guy", whatever you want to call it. From an outsider's point of view, what looks worse? A team that can't win 20 games but lacks a superstar or a team that can't win 20 games but has one? Iverson doesn't make us any better because he only solves one of our 1,000 problems.
You want to get rid of Walsh because he thinks twice before he does anything. Something that Isiah is incapable of doing. Lmao @ calling me stupid when you're the guy who thinks that Iverson will turn this franchise around. You're literally the dumbest Knicks fan on this board and an embarrassment to New Yorkers everywhere. "Fuck 2010 I want to win now".
I said absolutely nothing that you indicated. Twelve-year olds shouldn't be allowed to post on ISH.
ar the Knicks personnel dept has always been pretty awful given they are the Mecca of basketball a lot of NBA stars would like to play for, and they've never gotten a true superstar since Ewing.
think about the two parts of your sentence. a lot of nba stars want to play for them, yet they somehow havent been able to land one? The knicks as a mecca of bball is just ridiculous. they have been an average to below average team most of their existence and thats not changing soon.
think about the two parts of your sentence. a lot of nba stars want to play for them, yet they somehow havent been able to land one? The knicks as a mecca of bball is just ridiculous. they have been an average to below average team most of their existence and thats not changing soon.
When was the last time that the Knicks were under the cap?
Think outside the box for a moment. The Knicks lack a "superstar" or a "go to guy", whatever you want to call it. From an outsider's point of view, what looks worse? A team that can't win 20 games but lacks a superstar or a team that can't win 20 games but has one? Iverson doesn't make us any better because he only solves one of our 1,000 problems.
what? Seriously wtf are you smoking? I don't even know how you logic'd that. So there are too many issues with the Knicks so you might as well not address any of them? Is that what you're saying?
think twice about what? what is there to lose? tell me i'm not seeing it
We're not talkiing about the Rockets here and it might ruin a good thing they have going. We're talkiing about one of the worst teams in the NBA with very little talent any 5 playing D really respects at all.
what? Seriously wtf are you smoking? I don't even know how you logic'd that. So there are too many issues with the Knicks so you might as well not address any of them? Is that what you're saying?
No, that's not what I'm saying.
I'm saying if we have a superstar player and we still suck(which we will with Iverson), our team actually looks worse than if we don't have one. We can blame our futility on the fact that we don't have that guy to close games out in the 4th quarter.
When was the last time that the Knicks were under the cap?
Ages ago. That's because they keep signing players they think are Superstars to big contracts (e.g. Randolph) whilst signing crap players to long contracts, again taking too much cap space. If everyone wanted to play for them, they wouldn't have to offer someone like Zach $14m per year to get them to stay.
Re: Knicks will NOT offer Iverson a contract
You're literally the dumbest Knicks fan on this board.
