Originally Posted by hateraid
I'd take Chris Mullin over King. Mullin was more dynamic. King is to Mullin is like what Melo is to Bird.
Yea, that's a pretty comparison...but dynamic...I don't know if that's the term I'd use. I also don't know that Mullin was better than a peak King. King was a monster. Mullin reminds me the most of Larry Bird, but with better handles and much less rebounding...and obviously not as good.
Grant Hill is a first-tier SF who just got hurt as he entered his prime. He still had 7 legit all-star seasons and 6 legit All-NBA seasons, along with being no worse than a top 10 player for 5 years.