Originally Posted by boozehound
wait. so your first post uses history "before WW2" to justify the isreali occupation and now you are arguing that historical claims are meaningless and might makes right? Talk about confused.
also, the historical claims of jews to "Israel" is tenuous at best from my perspective. The majority of jews who lived in the middle east 2 millennia ago are more genetically related to the modern islamic populations in the region that most of the jews who emigrated there.
Not confusing at all.
Quote my two comments and point out how they challenge each other. I had a response ready, but I'd rather you specify what parts are at odds with each other. I carefully read my two posts and cannot see any contradictions or anything else.