They need a search warrant to search your car. Unless the weed was visible in the car the cop had no right to search it. Unless the cop has reasonable suspicion that he will find something in your car, he can search your car without your consent.
beasley's car was probably full of drug paraphernalia...
They need a search warrant to search your car. Unless the weed was visible in the car the cop had no right to search it. Unless the cop has reasonable suspicion that he will find something in your car, he can search your car without your consent.
Well if he's talking to Super Cool Beas and he's super high he could search the car.
They need a search warrant to search your car. Unless the weed was visible in the car the cop had no right to search it. Unless the cop has reasonable suspicion that he will find something in your car, he can search your car without your consent.
In many States the odor of marijuana alone is PC, no warrant needed... I'm willing to bet that it could be easily smelled thus giving the officer PC and the right to search his vehicle.
unless you've been leaving under a rock, drug paraphenalia is probable cause for cops to search you/house/car. This is common knowledge.
My comment was actually directed towards the people claiming that police require search warrants to search cars, or that Beasley was somehow unaware of his civil rights by allowing police to search his vehicle.
Re: Beasley busted for pot
:
