Originally Posted by I.R.Beast
MW2 is the worst of the last 4 CODs....excessive camping...stacking killstreaks, and imblanace.... Black ops is easily a better game...the only advantage i give to MW2 is graphics and gun sounds, but Black Ops has accomplished better balance than Mw2.
Black Ops is worse.
Boring, slow, weak grenades, famas, 74u, ghost, total gun imbalance.
It seems like the people who work on the games don't know what they're doing when the game comes out. The first thing they need is some sort of beta that people that play the game a lot get to participate in so a gun like the famas doesn't exist.
In what scenario is the Enfield superior to the famas? For me, only if I was laying prone with ghost, clipping, or the player had bad aim would I see myself killing someone using the famas with my enfield.
They suck at patching. I'm aware treyarch often patches games, but they act like they're unable to change the guns. Now I never really played BFBC2, but I heard that the guns constantly got nerfed and buffed. The only guns that got nerfed in BO was the G11(I think?), famas, and 74u. And that didn't change pure gun damage statistics. Just the recoil. Wanna fix the famas? Reduce it and the AUG(same gun, different skin and recoil) to having 10 or 15 less damage across the board.
Yes MW2 has its flaws that shine brighter than a star. OMA danger close tubes, commando, next to useless frag grenades, and gun glitches that literally render some attachments useless. M9 silenced, for example. But its still a fun game. There is lots of different fun things you can do in it that you cannot do in black ops.
Also, it is a faster paced game.