I explained that 3 times now nit-wit including the post you just f*cking quoted...
seems teams pass plenty on Oakland..... not Nnamdi though...
whatever team he's on? his targets will be low...
people would have respect for you if you could point to a legitimate reason to question Nnamdi's talent but you cant..
you are stuck pretending that it is because nobody throws on Oakland, instead of admitting that nobody throws on Nnamdi... well the numbers say you lie..
Quote:
I already addressed it...said obviously they ignore Nnamdi who is cleary beter than Routt
Nnamdi is clearly better than anyone not named Revis
so Sheed if Nnamdi gets significantly more targets while in Philly will you admitt you are wrong then?...and that being in Oakland was in fact a big factor???
so Sheed if Nnamdi gets significantly more targets while in Philly will you admitt you are wrong then?...and that being in Oakland was in fact a big factor???
yes or no???
just say yes or no...
YES OR NO
his numbers will always be lower than most... he could have had 50+ targets in the data state property posted.. but he didnt primetime...
the numbers are skewed bad enough to show the obvious trend which is that teams are avoiding Nnamdi because he is Nnamdi and not because he happens to play on the raiders
this is something you refuse to admit..... and thats the whole point of this convo...
so Sheed if Nnamdi gets significantly more targets while in Philly will you admitt you are wrong then?...and that being in Oakland was in fact a big factor???
wow I don't see a "YES" or a "NO" in there...all I asked for
can't even answer a simple question...
@ Rasheetard
you wont get a yes or no skip-playfaker because I not stupid enough to buy into your arguments....
your whole BS argument revolves around the idea that somehow Nnamdi is an unknown because he didnt get alot of targets.... nobody buys that argument so it doesnt make sense for me focus in on targets more than the reason for the targets (or lack of targets)
Revis was targeted alot and he is a great corner also. a different kind of corner but also a great one....
that dumb argument blaming it on Oakland is YOUR argument and I'm happy to let YOU own it
You know Aso's 31 targets last year accounted for .06% of the Raiders 470 total? .06% of the Titans (who led the league in passes against) would be 41.2 targets. The only time I saw the ball thrown Aso's way in preseason was the PI call everyone was debating vs. the Browns. Everyone throws Asante's way because he plays off his man and they appear open.
What's the avy bet # primetime? I'll take it. You're throwing out #s like 50 and 60+, wanna just set it at 45...I take the under and you the over?
edit: we already have one going for Miles Austin being top 3 in receiving yards
TAC are you from Arizona or just a Cardinals fan? Just asking. Didn't know Cardinals fans knew so much about, you know, football. You're a good read. Great addition to the forum.
Both.
Can't say I blame you for thinking that way though. The cohesive cluelessness of Arizona sports fans has been a source of amusement for myself and friends for years. The problem is that most people moved here from somewhere else and carried their team allegiances with them. As the kids actually born here in the late 70s and 1980s have grown up, it's legitimized the fan bases quite a bit in recent years. The Suns were of course the original sports team and have had a loyal, knowledgable following for decades. The Arizona Cardinals were shunned due to extremely cheap ownership non-moves. For most of the 1990s, there wasn't any type of effort put forth to build a contending team and a lot of people loved to hate them, even make fun of them. They could never sellout a game and have it televised locally unless the Cowboys were in town and half the stadium was in blue and white. If you wanted to watch a Cardinals game, you either took your ass to the bleachers in the 110-degree heat or wait until they went on the road. Bidwill family all but promised competitive teams if the prop for a real stadium passed and I think it barely took 51% of the vote with so many people skeptical. Low and behold, by hook or crook, they've stayed pretty true to it. And they've been rewarded: 55-consecutive sellouts since they moved into UofP stadium. Every preseason, regular season and playoff game since 2006 has sold out.
Nnamdi vs. Routt game by game targets, catches, yards, TD's, etc. Pretty cool.
Awesome Stuff.
Now, if only we could get this type of information for a year-to-year basis on all of the CBs I listed when comparing their accolades we'd be in business. I've seen people post some of Deion's from the mid-90s and yes he was phenomenal, but I don't know how accurate it is. Tough to be 100% sure when this stuff isn't openly tracked and put out there by the NFL. Just another example in a long history of deglecting defensive metrics and being absurdly late. What a joke that official sacks weren't tracked until 1982, or tackles and passes defensed until 2001. You've got to be kidding me.
Now, if only we could get this type of information for a year-to-year basis on all of the CBs I listed when comparing their accolades we'd be in business. I've seen people post some of Deion's from the mid-90s and yes he was phenomenal, but I don't know how accurate it is. Tough to be 100% sure when this stuff isn't openly tracked and put out there by the NFL. Just another example in a long history of deglecting defensive metrics and being absurdly late. What a joke that official sacks weren't tracked until 1982, or tackles and passes defensed until 2001. You've got to be kidding me.
i agree every possible outcome should have a stat at this point in Pro Football
Re: Darrelle Revis vs. Nnamdi Asomugha
@ Rasheetard
You're a good read. Great addition to the forum.
