|
None Greater
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 652
|
Re: Who was better in their prime: TO or Moss?
Moss and rather comfortably. He was arguably the best WR in the NFL the moment he came onto the field in his first game. His first seven seasons in the league are about as prolific as it gets.
1998: 69 rec, 1313 yards, 17 TD, 19.0 Y/R, 82.1 Y/G
1999: 80 rec, 1413 yards, 11 TD, 17.7 Y/R, 88.3 Y/G
2000: 77 rec, 1437 yards, 15 TD, 18.7 Y/R, 90.0 Y/G
2001: 82 rec, 1233 yards, 10 TD, 15.0 Y/R, 77.1 Y/G
2002: 106 rec, 1347 yards, 7 TD, 12.7 Y/R, 84.2 Y/G
2003: 111 rec, 1632 yards, 17 TD, 14.7 Y/R, 102.0 Y/G
2004: 49 rec, 767 yards, 13 TD, 15.7 Y/R, 59.0 Y/G (13 games)
Not at all a bad playoff performer during this time period either:
1998 DIV: 4 rec, 73 yards, 1 TD, 18.3 Y/R
1998 NFC: 6 rec, 75 yards, 1 TD, 12.5 Y/R
1999 WC: 5 rec, 127 yards, 1 TD, 25.4 Y/R
1999 DIV: 9 rec, 188 yards, 2 TD, 20.9 Y/R
2000 DIV: 2 rec, 121 yards, 2 TD, 60.5 Y/R
2000 NFC: 2 rec, 18 yards, 0 TD, 9.0 Y/R
2004 WC: 4 rec, 70 yards, 2 TD, 17.5 Y/R
2004 DIV: 3 rec, 51 yards, 0 TD, 17.0 Y/R
Definitely hit a huge, fairly publicized snag in Oakland 2005-2006. Hit 30 years old and was written off by many only to go completely ballistic the following season:
2007: 98 rec, 1493 yards, 23 TD, 15.2 Y/R, 93.3 Y/G
2008: 69 rec, 1008 yards, 11 TD, 14.6 Y/R, 63.0 Y/G (Brady injury Wk1)
2009: 83 rec, 1264 yards, 13 TD, 15.3 Y/R, 79.0 Y/G
|