Re: Replace 2001/2002 and 2002/2003 Jason Kidd with MVP Steve Nash
Hes more than capable of replacing Kidd in ways. Hes better in the half court. But hes not as fast and that was agood bit of Kidds value to those teams....but the main issue is defense. The Nets were allowing 90 points on like 42% shooting. Im not sure Nash doesnt take too much from that defense. Even if you think Nash is better than Kidd was(I do not) you cant say the Nets underachieved. And they wouldnt have done any better with Nash. Arent beating the Lakers or Spurs. But for defensive reasons its at least possible they fall shorter in the playoffs. I suspect it would be similar results though.