For the money they are paying Wells right now, they can't.
So they're going to pay him his ridiculous contract and make the team worse? They need to pay him, but he's making them worse and Trout has nothing left to prove at Triple A, he's hitting over .400 down there.
I don't get that logic. They are paying wells that money regardless. It's a sunk cost. If they can get more value by playing trout(and clearly they could) then they should play him
Yep. I agree completely. Bench his ass, he sucks, it's time to bite the bullet and admit they screwed up and get Trout his playing time. They have to pay Wells regardless, but he's making them worse, if he cries about being benched? Release him.
I hate the logic of "he sucks and we have better replacements but we have to play him because he's paid a lot"