I'm just ready for turning over a new leaf for once. I don't see WSH finishing last consistently anymore. They have a lot to prove but there's a basis to think they will be a better team.
As for the rest of your post, until the day comes when you chill out and refrain from vendettas against posters that are fans of the NFC East (namely myself and pt) you will continue to get it right back. I do that with nobody else on this board but you hawk every post pt makes and I guess I'm your new target which is fine. Just expect the same classless brand of communication that your city is known for
I'm just ready for turning over a new leaf for once. I don't see WSH finishing last consistently anymore. They have a lot to prove but there's a basis to think they will be a better team.
Given the history of QBs the past decade or so? I'm pretty sure you are.
Quote:
As for the rest of your post, until the day comes when you chill out and refrain from vendettas against posters that are fans of the NFC East (namely myself and pt) you will continue to get it right back. I do that with nobody else on this board but you hawk every post pt makes and I guess I'm your new target which is fine. Just expect the same classless brand of communication that your city is known for
Whats with posters here that feel they are apart of some special class thats being replied to by me? You guys are really full of yourselves. Dont flatter yourself slapnuts. I dont have 50,000 posts because you are primetime are on my radar. I go at primetime because he often says something stupid and I chin check him on it. I chuckled at your silly notion that RGIII going to Wash will have it easier to win games. Another poster agreed with me. I said nothing offbase, off the wall. A rookie QB going to a team that lived in the basement the past 4 seasons in a tough division (with experienced defenses) is NO?T going to have an easier time winning. I didnt even factor the Chicago Bears, Detroit Lions, GB Packers, SF 49ers of the world as well. Not sure about the schedule. But the NFC is tough as is let alone the NFC East. You even admitted I made valid points, so there should be no issue with me quoting/replying to you RODhead.
If I said RGIII will bust, overrated prospect and Deadskins will enjoy another joke at QB? If I said a bunch of invalid, irrelevant, offbase and ridiculous remarks? And was consistent in doing so towards you? Then yeah maybe your posts holds some weight. Unfortunately? It doesnt. Sorry bub.
Oh and I dont dish out nothing I cant handle. So you wont hear me complain, cry, whine about someone going at my posts here. My city would whup your city by the way.
Honestly I think Washington was the worst possible destination for Robert Griffin. The O-line isn't very good, the WR's are unimpressive (I like Pierre Garcon but he's NOT a #1 WR), and they don't have many playmakers. Plus the secondary isn't great so there is a chance that the "Skins will need RG3 to lead more than his fair share of comebacks.
Honestly I think Washington was the worst possible destination for Robert Griffin. The O-line isn't very good, the WR's are unimpressive (I like Pierre Garcon but he's NOT a #1 WR), and they don't have many playmakers. Plus the secondary isn't great so there is a chance that the "Skins will need RG3 to lead more than his fair share of comebacks.
You obviously know very little about football.
From an offensive schematics stand point, it is agreed by many football analysts that Washington/ Shanahan offense is probably one of the BEST situations to end up in being a guy like Griffin. Many rollouts/throws on the run are implemented.
When you echo the sentiments of a scorned Donovan McNabb, you know your football opinion isn't of the brightest stature.
The offensive line is pretty decent actually. The stats don't look good cuz Beck got sacked like 10 times 1 game lol and didn't know what he was doing in the pocket. The line is coming together and there's still the draft.
No playmakers? Well not many proven ones but Garcon is a playmaker, as is Josh Morgan (San Fran's best receiver who got injured)
Fred Davis- playmaker
Roy Helu- playmaker
Jabar Gaffney- capable of executing plays lol
Last edited by ROCSteady : 04-08-2012 at 07:54 AM.
From an offensive schematics stand point, it is agreed by many football analysts that Washington/ Shanahan offense is probably one of the BEST situations to end up in being a guy like Griffin. Many rollouts/throws on the run are implemented.
When you echo the sentiments of a scorned Donovan McNabb, you know your football opinion isn't of the brightest stature.
The offensive line is pretty decent actually. The stats don't look good cuz Beck got sacked like 10 times 1 game lol and didn't know what he was doing in the pocket. The line is coming together and there's still the draft.
No playmakers? Well not many proven ones but Garcon is a playmaker, as is Josh Morgan (San Fran's best receiver who got injured)
Fred Davis- playmaker
Roy Helu- playmaker
Jabar Gaffney- capable of executing plays lol
Redskins may be better atm but I'd rather take Indy's situation. They are going to actually have draft picks for the future and will have the resources to build around Luck. They'll probably draft his buddy, Fleener, in the second and will probably address WR in this year and next years draft.
also, Garcon and Morgan are just average receivers.. Reggie Wayne despite his age is still a much better receiver than the both of them
'Skins fans are delusional. I've learned over my years living in the DC-area not to debate with you guys. Simply state my point, hear your rebuttal, then agree to disagree.
That said, I will my add final two thoughts on Griffin's fit. The pass tree that Baylor used is basically all deep/outside the numbers stuff. The 'Skins do mostly intermediate/inside the numbers. That's an adjustment that will take time.
Also, I keep hearing people talk about Griffin doing a bunch of boot and roll type stuff, yet it wasn't a MAJOR part of his success at Baylor. why is everyone saying that he needs those plays to succeed?