Message Board Basketball Forum - InsideHoops

Go Back   Message Board Basketball Forum - InsideHoops > InsideHoops Main Basketball Forums > NBA Forum

NBA Forum NBA Message Board - NBA Fan Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-23-2012, 09:51 AM   #1
Godzuki
3-time NBA All-Star
 
Godzuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 10,627
Default So the Lakers are pretty much screwed for the next couple years...

http://nba-point-forward.si.com/2012...ure/?hpt=hp_t3

For Lakers, becoming championship contenders again will be a tall order


The Lakers likely will need to break up their frontcourt of Pau Gasol (left) and Andrew Bynum in order to upgrade around Kobe Bryant. (Stephen Dunn/Getty Images)

An optimist might look at the Lakers-Thunder series and come away thinking about how close Los Angeles is to championship contention. The middle three games of Oklahoma City’s five-game win in the Western Conference semifinals were all close, and with better crunch-time execution, the Lakers could have won all three and be headed home for a chance to close the deal in Game 6.

But that’s the wrong way to look at things, and the Lakers know it internally. The other two games were Oklahoma City runaways, and mixing blowout losses with down-to-the-wire contests is no way to win a playoff series. Luck, fatigue and randomness will inevitably swing a crunch-time game or two against you, and given the taxing load that the Lakers’ three best players carried all season, fatigue surely played a role in late collapses during Game 2 and Game 4 — the latter forever known as the game in which Kobe Bryant went completely off the rails, and then threw a long-tenured champion teammate under the bus.

This team was never a real championship contender. The Lakers had the sixth-best point differential among Western Conference teams, and they just couldn’t function as an elite club on both ends of the floor. They struggled to score in the first half of the season, checking in as a league-average offense. The March trade for point guard Ramon Sessions goosed the offense, but the defense collapsed over the final 20 games, surrendering points at a rate that would have made it the NBA’s worst for the full season. Sessions, among the worst defenders in the league for his position, didn’t help, but he alone cannot explain a team playing top-10 level defense for half a season and then hemorrhaging points like the Bobcats for 20 games, plus the playoffs.

The Lakers were just never that good, and their top three pieces don’t mesh as well as they used to, given the lack of talent and outside shooting around them. According to NBA.com’s stats tool, the Lakers outscored opponents by only 2.8 points per 100 possessions with Bryant, Pau Gasol and Andrew Bynum on the floor together. That’s a very low number for a star-studded trio on a decent team. And when you scan the team’s lineup data, what jumps out is the fact that no combination of two, three or four players did much to transform the Lakers. Most teams have duos or trios that result in dramatically improved (or worsened) play on one or both ends of the floor, but the numbers for every relevant Lakers combination basically hover around the same “good but not good enough” area, indicating that the foundation here is rotten.

The Lakers now have to ask if the Bryant/Gasol/Bynum trio is inherently limited because of Bryant’s declining skills, Gasol’s masquerading as L.A.’s Brandon Bass and Bynum’s now-and-then effort issues, or if that core would work better if the Lakers nail a couple of transactions on the fringes. They need shooting and speed — wow, do they need speed — in addition to finding a way to convince Bryant that he does not need the ball all of the time on the perimeter. The Sessions trade was supposed to help that process along; it ultimately failed.

In short: We have two seasons’ worth of evidence now suggesting that this team is not a real contender — not with the Thunder still growing, the Spurs sustaining greatness and teams in Denver, Memphis and the other one at Staples Center rising around the Lakers.

The question now is how to change that. Any prescription must begin with the sobering reality that the collective bargaining agreement offers the Lakers almost nothing with which to work. Acquiring a meaningful free agent will be very difficult, which means the Lakers will almost inevitably have to trade either Gasol or Bynum to upgrade the roster around Bryant. Salvation isn’t coming via the draft, either, because the Lakers traded their 2012 first-round pick to the Cavaliers for Sessions and sent a future first-round pick — which was acquired from Dallas in the Lamar Odom deal — to Houston in the Derek Fisher trade. They also gave Cleveland, which has its own first-round pick as well as Miami’s in the 2013 draft, the right to swap any of its picks with the Lakers’ selection next year. That’s a nice little get for the Cavs, who will almost surely jump up a half-dozen or so draft spots because they can send the Heat’s pick to the Lakers.

Once the Lakers inevitably pick up Bynum’s $16 million option for next season, they will have more than $80 million on the books. They cannot even see the salary cap (projected again to be around $58 million) from where they are, and they will be far over the luxury-tax line. The tax stays at the old dollar-for-dollar rate next season, but being over the tax carries a few serious penalties:

• The Lakers do not have access to the full mid-level exception, a key lure for ring-chasing veterans and solid mid-career role players. Los Angeles can offer only the mini mid-level exception for taxpayers, a three-year deal worth about $3 million annually. The full mid-level allows for a four-year deal with a starting annual salary a shade over $5 million. The difference might not matter to all players, but it will surely matter to some.

• While the new, harsher tax rates haven’t kicked in, the clock on the so-called “repeater penalty” has already started. Beginning in the 2014-15 season, any team that has paid the luxury tax in each of the previous three seasons will pay nearly 1.5 times the normal tax rate. The Lakers paid the tax this season and will almost certainly pay it next season, which means that in 2013-14 — when Bryant and Gasol are set to make $50 million combined — they may scramble like heck to get under the tax line. The Lakers are a money-bags team with the best local TV deal in the league, but the Buss family does not have any giant outside cash cow, and the new revenue-sharing plan will hurt. The team is already in money-saving mode, having dumped salary at the trade deadline, in the Odom deal and in the aborted Chris Paul trade.

This matters when you begin tossing around Gasol/Bynum deals that pile on long-term money.

• The Lakers cannot offer the biannual exception, and they don’t have quite as much flexibility as non-tax teams in terms of how much salary they can take back in a trade. (For the full details, see Larry Coon’s must-read guide to the salary cap).

The Lakers do have the $8.9 million Odom trade exception for another few months, and they could use the amnesty clause to waive Metta World Peace, who has two years and $15 million left on his deal. Shedding World Peace wouldn’t put them under the tax line, and it would leave a gaping hole at small forward that second-year player Devin Ebanks hasn’t proved he is ready to fill. Point guard Steve Blake, due $8 million over the next two seasons, is also a potential amnesty candidate.

So in terms of non-trade options, the Lakers are limited to the veteran’s minimum exception and the mini mid-level. They could add a free agent or two via those mechanisms, but the free-agent crop is thin, and the top ring-chasing veterans are either worth much more (Kevin Garnett), think they are (Jason Kidd), play Bryant’s position (Ray Allen, Jason Terry) or are so close to washed up on one end of the floor as to be risky signings (Antawn Jamison, a big defensive liability). It’s tempting to suggest that Bryant could shift to small forward to accommodate the signing of a true shooting guard, but he hasn’t played that position for anything but short stretches — and usually with bench units — over the last few seasons.

No matter how you slice it, you keep coming back to dealing Gasol or Bynum for either a star (i.e. Orlando’s Dwight Howard) or multiple pieces that fit the roster better. In the latter scenario, those additions would provide some quality at point guard and on the wing, and allow the Lakers’ leftover big-man star to operate as the team’s only true center.

A trade of both Gasol and Bynum for Howard and Hedo Turkoglu has always worked, but that leaves the rest of the roster pretty bare, even if it would save the Lakers money in the short- and long-term. A Bynum-for-Howard deal works straight up and doesn’t really affect the Lakers’ long-term cap situation, but the Magic would figure to ask for other goodies — a future first-round pick and the dumping of Turkoglu’s toxic deal, which includes $17.8 million in guaranteed money over the next two seasons. (Turkoglu’s salary, by the way, does not fit into the Odom trade exception.) And even if the Lakers could swing the Howard/Bynum swap, it still leaves Gasol floating around the perimeter for much of the game. Howard’s defense would be such a huge upgrade that the awkward fit might not matter, though.

Bottom line: Transforming the Lakers into a title contender again will require some luck and some major risk.



wow between their trades and draft pick deals, salary cap situation of which they're way over and will be in the future, and not being able to bring in vets with a decent mid lvl exception that isn't minimal, the Lakers can only get worse the next few seasons? they might even have to let Artest go to save on salary cap? i guess the Dwight deal is the only card they have that looks remotely appealing to turn things around, and the article makes a good point about Pau still being on the outside even then with a lesser scorer inside in Dwight.

daaamn Lakers are f*cked
Godzuki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2012, 09:58 AM   #2
Punpun
Head Connoisseur
 
Punpun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Kicking asses since Dec11'
Posts: 3,587
Default Re: So the Lakers are pretty much screwed for the next couple years...

Dude, I disagree. G1 of the Denver series shown the Lakers dominating without having to force anything. Why ? Because the bench and bynum/Pau were playing alright.

You only needs to upgrade the bench and motivate bynum/Pau in order to have the Lakers contending.
Punpun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2012, 10:06 AM   #3
SunsCaptain
Local High School Star
 
SunsCaptain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,715
Default Re: So the Lakers are pretty much screwed for the next couple years...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Punpun
Dude, I disagree. G1 of the Denver series shown the Lakers dominating without having to force anything. Why ? Because the bench and bynum/Pau were playing alright.

You only needs to upgrade the bench and motivate bynum/Pau in order to have the Lakers contending.

And how do you plan on "upgrading" the bench?
SunsCaptain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2012, 10:10 AM   #4
Punpun
Head Connoisseur
 
Punpun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Kicking asses since Dec11'
Posts: 3,587
Default Re: So the Lakers are pretty much screwed for the next couple years...

By upgrading it.
Punpun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2012, 10:13 AM   #5
coin24
Very good NBA starter
 
coin24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,253
Default Re: So the Lakers are pretty much screwed for the next couple years...

Its beyond motivating Pau/Bynum time....

Pau has sucked in the last 2 years playoffs now, and Bynum is a child. Trade him for another centre and let him go be the man elsewhere. He has great potential, but he doesnt give a fu*k, cant see that changing...

The bench needs 1 or 2 scorers, the amount of times teams killed the Lakers to start the 4th qtr this season was disgusting..
coin24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2012, 10:28 AM   #6
SunsCaptain
Local High School Star
 
SunsCaptain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,715
Default Re: So the Lakers are pretty much screwed for the next couple years...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Punpun
By upgrading it.

SunsCaptain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2012, 10:31 AM   #7
swi7ch
Banned
 
swi7ch's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 4,454
Default Re: So the Lakers are pretty much screwed for the next couple years...

Too bad Kobe is untradeable. Otherwise, fixing the Lakers would be easier...
swi7ch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2012, 10:37 AM   #8
Punpun
Head Connoisseur
 
Punpun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Kicking asses since Dec11'
Posts: 3,587
Default Re: So the Lakers are pretty much screwed for the next couple years...

Quote:
Originally Posted by SunsCaptain
Next time don't ask a stupid question.
Punpun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2012, 11:19 AM   #9
G-Funk
Palm Trees & Gangsters
 
G-Funk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,376
Default Re: So the Lakers are pretty much screwed for the next couple years...

Lakers just need a deep bench, and they would be in position anything extra like Dwight/Bynum trade, or Nash signing will make us favorite. Dont forget this season was a crazy yr for the Lakers.
G-Funk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2012, 11:20 AM   #10
HylianNightmare
Moe Harkless Bandwagon
 
HylianNightmare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 13,595
Default Re: So the Lakers are pretty much screwed for the next couple years...

i'm sure they will land dwight
HylianNightmare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2012, 11:21 AM   #11
MJ(Mean John)
The Fresh Prince
 
MJ(Mean John)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Lakeshow
Posts: 4,486
Default Re: So the Lakers are pretty much screwed for the next couple years...

NOT IF WE DEAL BYDUMB FOR deron Williams and marshon brooks! ;)
MJ(Mean John) is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2012, 12:26 PM   #12
NumberSix
Big Booty Hoes!!
 
NumberSix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: The Internets
Posts: 23,200
Default Re: So the Lakers are pretty much screwed for the next couple years...

This is the price of those 2 championships. You gotta mortgage you future if you want to win now. The Lakers did the winning, and this is the price for it. Worth it IMO.
NumberSix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2012, 12:31 PM   #13
DTreats
Banned
 
DTreats's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,363
Default Re: So the Lakers are pretty much screwed for the next couple years...

Quote:
Originally Posted by NumberSix
This is the price of those 2 championships. You gotta mortgage you future if you want to win now. The Lakers did the winning, and this is the price for it. Worth it IMO.
The Heat did the same thing last year, the only difference being that they won't win shit anytime soon. Worth it IMO.
DTreats is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2012, 01:31 PM   #14
Jimmy2k8
NBA rookie of the year
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,255
Default Re: So the Lakers are pretty much screwed for the next couple years...

Quote:
Originally Posted by swi7ch
Too bad Kobe is untradeable. Otherwise, fixing the Lakers would be easier...

Lakers would never trade Kobe anyway.
Jimmy2k8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2012, 02:11 PM   #15
I<3NBA
NBA lottery pick
 
I<3NBA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 5,214
Default Re: So the Lakers are pretty much screwed for the next couple years...

Kobe is not going quietly into the night.
I<3NBA is offline   Reply With Quote
This NBA Basketball News Website Sponsored by:
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:29 AM.




NBA Basketball Forum Key Links:
InsideHoops Home
NBA Rumors
Basketball Blog
NBA Daily Recaps
NBA Videos
Fantasy Basketball
NBA Mock Draft
NBA Free Agents
All-Star Weekend
---
High School Basketball
Streetball
---
InsideHoops Twitter
Search Our Site













Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Terms of Use/Service | Privacy Policy