Why is no one talking up the Mountaineers??

[dwillreg]

Somehow I doubt that look at all the players in the NFL. Even the ones that don't make pro sports are still athletic.

[ClutchCityReturns]

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Yeah, solid careers. At best. There are many prospects that have the potential of 25 ppg, 10 rpg, 9 apg, 3 bpg, etc... Much more than solid. Pitsnogle will probably be an average PF at best. IMO he is not strong enough to compete with many PFs in the NBA. Gansey has more upside than Pits. In the right organization, he could score 20 per game (after a few years). However, I doubt he'll find that organization. I see Gansey geing an average guard... Maybe 15-18 ppg and 5 apg.

- D4rk -

25/10/9/3? I seriously hope you were referring to different players with each of those stat categories because the line you just suggested, sustained over a decent period of time, would put someone in discussions with the greatest to ever play the game. Yet you say there are many prospects that could do that...

Also, if Gansey were truly expected to end up averaging 15-18ppg and 5apg, he would probably go Top 5 in this draft.

How old are you?

[dwillreg]

Yea I agree. Many players with 23/10/9? Gansey will be a suprise if his career average is above 10.

[lawlerslaw100]

Gansey will be a surprise if his career average is above 10.

Now you see why I compare him to Eric Piatowski. Pike in his years with the Clips averaged 8-9 a game and over 40% from behind the arc.

If you don't think Mike Gansey is more atheletic than Eric Piatkoski you know less about the NBA than Skip Bayless...That is rediculous..

[dwillreg]

Originally Posted by lawlerslaw100

Now you see why I compare him to Eric Piatowski. Pike in his years with the Clips averaged 8-9 a game and over 40% from behind the arc.

I Think Gansey Plays Better D And Is A Better Passer But 8 Or 9 Points Is What I Would Expect From Gansey.

[d_white089]

Gansey, if put in the right system, could average 18-22 points a game within a year or 2..he's 23..so he's probably developed..but my goodness didn't you guys see him play..He COULD be very much like Richard Hamilton..

[dwillreg]

Doubtful

[djfleet]

Originally Posted by d_white089

Gansey, if put in the right system, could average 18-22 points a game within a year or 2..he's 23..so he's probably developed..but my goodness didn't you guys see him play..He COULD be very much like Richard Hamilton..

not a chance

[dwillreg]

Gansey in the right system could average 13-16 points per game and that is the absolute maximum for him my friend.

[d_white089]

OK one question..how many WVU games did you actually watch this year..go by the games not by what you've read on the internet..

BTW...there is only a 2 point difference between our predictions at 16 and 18..

[dwillreg]

First of all I am a UConn fan and watched a little bit of West Virginia. I know all of their players will probaly be products of the system cause they just shoot 3s and run back door cuts. I said 13-16 and you said 18-22. The differece could actually defined as me saying 13 and you saying 22 which is a 9 point difference.

[d_white089]

Ok we can agree to disagree..

[dwillreg]

Dude I think Gansey is a good player with a big heart and great hustle and help me out which game was it in the tournament he carried WVU with like all of their overtime points? Anyway that was unbalievable and I think he has a chance to be a starting SG, but he will never be a stud and probaly always be a backup. He's got guts though.

[d_white089]

It was Wake Forest..2nd Round..2OT..

I never said he would be a stud..I never even said he would be great...I said he could be very good if in the right system..