I'm fundamentally disagree with your league's particular rules, but you guys use some sort of pay site right? Yahoo doesn't offer that.
Yes, but then again I've always been in favor of this league using a pay site, too. It really doesn't cost much when you have 12 people chipping in and other sites are vastly superior to yahoo, not just with things like controlling rosters and other rules, but just watching a game while being updated.
CBSSportsline is the sh!t. Makes it so much more enjoyable to me.
Yes, but then again I've always been in favor of this league using a pay site, too. It really doesn't cost much when you have 12 people chipping in and other sites are vastly superior to yahoo, not just with things like controlling rosters and other rules, but just watching a game while being updated.
CBSSportsline is the sh!t. Makes it so much more enjoyable to me.
Oh I know you have, and we should look into moving this league to a pay site, and hammering out every little detail in advance of next season. This year has been headache after headache and I apologize for contributing to that.
nope. The way it is now, waivers will start when the first game of the week starts, that is usually Thursday at 820PM eastern.
Regardless of what it is voted for, the settings MUST be changed back to what they were for this week. No one had any notice of this whatsoever. If people vote for First Game-Tuesday, fine, but that should start next week.
Regardless of what it is voted for, the settings MUST be changed back to what they were for this week. No one had any notice of this whatsoever. If people vote for First Game-Tuesday, fine, but that should start next week.
Who voted to have it the other way? How was that decided?
Answer: it never was, I blindly picked it... not fair we should vote on whatever its going to be right now, its a 4-3 vote couple votes either way is most fair IMO
Who voted to have it the other way? How was that decided?
Answer: it never was, I blindly picked it... not fair we should vote on whatever its going to be right now, its a 4-3 vote couple votes either way is most fair IMO
That's fine, I have no problem with people voting on it. But you can not change a setting in the middle of a freaking week, whether it was voted on or not. I had no freaking idea this setting was going to be changed and I'm sure I'm not alone there. You MUST change it back for this week or you are being sensationally unfair.
That's fine, I have no problem with people voting on it. But you can not change a setting in the middle of a freaking week, whether it was voted on or not. I had no freaking idea this setting was going to be changed and I'm sure I'm not alone there. You MUST change it back for this week or you are being sensationally unfair.
Actually it was changed before this week, and it was because a certain league member kept exploiting a loophole. Not sure if I changed it back would it take guys off waivers who haven't played yet (who's team hasn't played yet)... I can look into that tonight, but lets finish this vote so this can be fair
Actually it was changed before this week, and it was because a certain league member kept exploiting a loophole. Not sure if I changed it back would it take guys off waivers who haven't played yet (who's team hasn't played yet)... I can look into that tonight, but lets finish this vote so this can be fair
I had no idea the setting was changed until Tuesday I believe, and I'm sure there's members who have not been checking this thread who had no idea they would be locked out of pickups. I'm pretty sure I told you that you should change it back upon noticing it, then I carried on with my life and forgot about it. You should not be changing settings during the week, especially without a vote. That is way outside your power as commish.
I'll admit, I didn't realize the gravity of this until just now. Gronk is on the injury report and since you only changed this setting a few days ago, I never had time to realize I should add a backup TE. Self-serving? Don't give a damn, I'm in the right here. My opponent Dooms doesn't have a backup TE for Gates this week and we all know that's playing with fire. Several people don't have backup QB's. No one had time to adjust to this new rule that hasn't even been voted on yet. You have to change it back, it's grossly unfair to me and everyone else.
It's not FAIR that it was changed this week without any vote from the setting it was originally on last week. Literally no other yahoo leagues I'm in use this retarded ass setting. DEFUALT is when the player game starts. You are changing these settings (trade setting you changed back to commish review even after we voted on league review till someone caught that) to your preference until someone says something then you put it to a vote. Shady stuff.
It's not FAIR that it was changed this week without any vote from the setting it was originally on last week. Literally no other yahoo leagues I'm in use this retarded ass setting. DEFUALT is when the player game starts. You are changing these settings (trade setting you changed back to commish review even after we voted on league review till someone caught that) to your preference until someone says something then you put it to a vote. Shady stuff.
Illinois, I can assure you that no one is doing anything shady. Bb4l Was protecting the inexperienced members of the league who weren't even aware of what was happening. The issue got addressed earlier in the thread and he decided to be proactive and adjust the rule since no one said anything. As far as the trade setting is concerned that was done only to expedite 1 trade.
Re: 3rd Annual ISH Money League
