Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ROCSteady
Get it out while you can. Perhaps we will be last again but I think we could be 8-8, 9-7 if all goes well and who knows, maybe your pu$$y ass squad or another team gets decimated w injuries and bad fortune.
That's why games are played. You're no prophet. Our d has a great front 7. Don't act like you know WSH inside out like that  |
First I'm not 36. Why do people get my age wrong?
Anyway, there you go again wishing for injuries. Thought you didnt do that ROChead? Tsk Tsk
7-9 (I see no lower than 6-10, no higher than 8-8) for Deadskins. I know your team just as well as you do. A rookie QB adjusting to a new offensive scheme? Good luck. Not only will he be trying to adjust and learn he will be against NFC East defenses which are good. NYG, Philly, Dallas. Slice it up however you want. I didnt even go into other tough defenses he'll face like the Balt Ravens, Pitt Steelers, Falcons and Bengals.
The ground attack is solid. Not bad, not great. No game breakers. Is that a need? No, BUT it depends on the passing game. And if RGIII goes thru struggles and woes be it adjusting and/or OL not helping keep him upright? Then you'll need someone to emerge in that committee of RB as a dependable threat. Good luck part II.
OL took a major hit with the fragile J.Brown. Your starting RT could most likely be Tyler Polumbus. Lets the lulz begin now. Hilarious how that RT position in Wash can never get right. Such a shame.
Wash secondary isnt the strongest group. Its headlined by the overrated talent known as Deagelo Falls. The front 7 is going to have its work cut out for them to make that unit respectable. Goff was a big loss, Orakpo is in a position where he either lives up to billing/emerges or not. He struggles to beat double teams so if he wants to be an impact rusher on the edge? He'll need to improve there. Is London Fletcher still going to be productive despite long in the tooth, losing a step? I'd still bet on him so I wont knock the old man. If the front 7 performs as expected they could keep Wash in games. If it falters, struggles that offense isnt going to be one putting up points.
Cam Newton had a tremondous rookie season. He didnt lead the Panthers to the playoffs or with a winning record. And dont mention Dalton without mentioning the favorable schedule Bengals had. So yeah enjoy the basement again and shoot for the following season to poke your chest out and talk winning record/playoffs.
Sidenote: I'm not a prophet but if I said Eagles will never be a dynasty. You'd agree, laugh and use it against me and my fellow Eagles fans. So shut that shyt up. The only difference with me and you? You're a fan of the Skins, I'm not. And I dont post negatives of the Skins in spite. I keep it real with my breakdowns. Skins are just not in position for a winning record/playoffs. This is obviously barring major injuries as you noted. But who wants to factor that in at this point? All things equal is what we're discussing. Not lookin for handouts from other teams.
Re: Vick - Eagles can potentially be a Dynasty
