If Kobe Can't Win It All in 2013 Then He Should NOT Be Top 10

[NumberSix]

Wasn't this exact argument made by Kobetards that if LeBron couldn't win with Wade & Bosh it would diminish his legacy? Oh, these rules don't apply now?

Hypocrisy much?

[G-Funk]

Originally Posted by NumberSix

Wasn't this exact argument made by Kobetards that if LeBron couldn't win with Wade & Bosh it would diminish his legacy? Oh, these rules don't apply now?

Hypocrisy much?

Losing in the Finals doesnt tarnish your legacy unless you dont have one. look at Magic, Bird, Shaq they all lost it happens.

[White Mamba]

Originally Posted by Is He Ill

Pshhhh...GTFOH, we're talking about a legend. Gotta love the Kobe haters. I've watched the dude destroy our conference time and time again. Best player of this generation, hands down. It's going to be his 17th season, stop acting like this is prime Kobe or some sh*t.

Thread

[raprap]

Kobes legacy is already a lock. He's stock will only go up at his age.


Kobe Bryant.

[Heavincent]

Yup, Kobe is a top 10 player all time and that won't change any time soon, I think people are just gonna have to...

[RRR3]

Originally Posted by Heavincent

Yup, Kobe is a top 10 player all time and that won't change any time soon, I think people are just gonna have to...

LOL awesome gif. I should use that one

[Dragonyeuw]

Kobe's already a top 10 player at this point; he won't cease to be one because of anything he hypothetically fails to do from here on out.

[BlackVVaves]

Great thread. Will read again, and again, and again.

[Heavincent]

Originally Posted by RRR3

LOL awesome gif. I should use that one

i just wanted an excuse to post it.

Might as well post some more gifs and pictures since this thread sucks anyway

[longtime lurker]

Originally Posted by funnystuff

Rings almost have nothing to do with individual talent/skill.

So should we judge players on who's the most "talented"? I thought the whole point of playing the game is the win championships, not put up stats. If you were paying attention the guy wrote that players shouldn't be judged on stats or rings so what then?

[riseagainst]

dang.... talk about a thread backfire.

[funnystuff]

Originally Posted by longtime lurker

So should we judge players on who's the most "talented"? I thought the whole point of playing the game is the win championships, not put up stats. If you were paying attention the guy wrote that players shouldn't be judged on stats or rings so what then?

How about watching them play?

[madmax]

Originally Posted by WeGetRing2012

I see no lies here

[Dictator]

How to make troll threads reasonable.

[lilgodfather1]

Originally Posted by kennethgriffin

lol wtf...


when was the last time a guy in his 17th season won finals mvp

its never happend

kobe will be the first. so if he doesnt do it... its not like its a huge failure


lebron lost with 2 other hall of famers in their prime ( and himself in his prime ) to dallas with just basically dirk playing anywhere near his prime. and the only other HOF'r ( kidd ) not near an allstar level


plus... the heat are almost just as stacked as LA.

so itel be kobe/nash/howard/artest/jamison vs lebron/wade/bosh/lewis/allen

i say the lakers are better. but its not like the lakers have as big an advantage as the heat had over dallas in 2011 AND STILL LOST


so by the OP's logit. theres no way lebron should ever be top 10

Bosh might not be a HOFer. And maybe no 17th season players have been FMVP, but 34 year olds have...