Re: Ty Lawson signs 4-year, $48 mill extension with Denver
Quote:
Originally Posted by NuggetsFan
Taller Nate? He just put up 16\7\4 on pretty good efficiency, and improved his play in the playoffs and helped Denver push L.A to 7. He'll never be an elite player or a guy you argue is top 10 or probably even 15 but with what Denver's doing you need to keep Lawson at any price really. You lose him than whatever you paid McGee\Gallo becomes useless because that whole winning as a team effort goes out the window. Some guy's are replaceable, some aren't.
Plus he's had the keys to the team for 92 games in the regular season. That's not even one and a half seasons. He was in a bench role early in his career, he still has a chance to improve on his last season. He could come out and do something like 18\7\3 while continuing to be a very efficient shooter, and if Denver finishing 3-6 than I can live with Lawson getting a few extra mill in a league where everybody is becoming overpaid
If we're talking numbers, Nate put up 17/4/4 in just under 30 minutes before.
Re: Ty Lawson signs 4-year, $48 mill extension with Denver
Quote:
Originally Posted by kNIOKAS
Rondo making 11 mil this year. Yes.
Rondo's contract is a steal, but it shouldn't be the standard. If Lawson keeps up his production and extends his abilities to a high all star level, his contract is very justified.
Re: Ty Lawson signs 4-year, $48 mill extension with Denver
Quote:
Originally Posted by gyu
If we're talking numbers, Nate put up 17/4/4 in just under 30 minutes before.
If were talking talking numbers he shot like 43% and was on a lottery team. If Lawson played for some shitty team going nowhere his numbers would obviously be better, like anybody's. However he did those numbers, while being efficient and helping his team win games. Two things Nate never did and never will...
No clue why I'm even responding to somebody who wants to compare Nate\Ty. You're looking at 3 numbers, not the "numbers".
Re: Ty Lawson signs 4-year, $48 mill extension with Denver
Quote:
Originally Posted by NuggetsFan
If were talking talking numbers he shot like 43% and was on a lottery team. If Lawson played for some shitty team going nowhere his numbers would obviously be better, like anybody's. However he did those numbers, while being efficient and helping his team win games. Two things Nate never did and never will...
No clue why I'm even responding to somebody who wants to compare Nate\Ty. You're looking at 3 numbers, not the "numbers".
Comparing Nate and Ty? They are just trolling. Don't worry about them.
Re: Ty Lawson signs 4-year, $48 mill extension with Denver
Quote:
Originally Posted by GOBB
Jrue Holiday is smiling. Appreciate the help there Denver.
When I saw the thread about Holiday & his payday couldn't help but think whoever got inked first would impact the other.
Lawson has def been the better player IMO but Holiday came into the league far more raw\more potential. Holiday ends up getting a big deal too. Can't even call players overpaid anymore. Either you pay them or you lose them to somebody else who will.