Quote:
|
Originally Posted by plowking
|
Nah, Rose should have won... i dont care what i said in the past..
Quote:
Now you change tune because it fits your argument right here.
|
My argument? Its only you who is arguing remember, against all facts which i just so happened to present for you... which you obviously dont like as it opposes your very biased and delusional opinion...
Quote:
|
If you're going to use that argument, Melo has a lot less help and is most likely going to end up with a similar record.
|
Are you Marty McFly? We are talking about the facts that are now... which goes something like:
1. Durant has better stats
2. Durant has better record
...and Carmelo maybe has less help, but he still needs to do his job on the winning & producing column...
Quote:
|
Also, aren't you the douchebag who was comparing per 36 minute stats to determine who was more productive? Melo is more productive.
|
Yes i am the "douchebag" who did that and i am the "douchebag" who will do it with Durant/Carmelo aswell, properly:
.......................Durant...........Carmelo... .....
PPG..................24.4................26.1..... .....Carmelo +1.7 ppg
RPG...................8.3..................7.2.... .......Durant +1.1 rpg
APG...................4.1..................1.9.... ......Durant +2.2 apg
SPG...................1.6..................0.8.... ......Durant +0.8 spg
BPG...................1.4..................0.5.... ......Durant +0.9 bpg
FG%.................50.5%.............46.9%....... Durant +3.6 %
3PT%................44.1%.............45.1%....... Carmelo +1.0 %
FT%..................89.9%.............79.8%...... Durant +10.1 %
Again........ see any difference? No? There is only one edge my friend and its leaning on Durants side, keep in mind what also 2.2 more assists do (1 assist means you was part of being accountable for 2-3 points on the boxscore)
Quote:
And when I said he was 3 times the rebounder, its pretty much true when it comes to offensive boards. 2.2 to 0.7 per 36 minutes.
|
Unfortunately that does not prove that Carmelo is "3 times the rebounder Durant is", that would be something like 27 rebounds a game technically speaking...
Do you really believe rebounding is measured by offensive rebounding or something? Even Westbrook averages more offensive rebounds than Durant, i guess that makes him a better rebounder huh? Again, you are going against something called LOGIC....
But in reality, who is the better rebounder between Durant & Carmelo sure is debatable i think, indeed. For me it is a mute point, you cant really prove who is the better rebounder, there is no significant difference or proof (unless you go by the current margin of statistical difference in complete off/def rebounding numbers).
Quote:
LOL at editing this part. You're an idiot for being unable to interpret my post correctly. No where did I say Melo is better than Lebron, nor that hes close.
.
|
I wasnt able to interpret your post correctly? Let us see here:
1. You said "Carmelo is my number 1", nothing else, which indicates what it says... that he is your number 1, i assume on the MVP ranking... because being number 1 best player all of the sudden would be even more absurd, but thats another story, which wouldnt surprise me if you would express by now.. which also indicates that you are not only favoring Carmelo over Durant but also Carmelo over Lebron....
2. You fought against perfectly reasonable, logical and factual context which only proves you not only wrong... but proves you to be a biased/delusional Carmelo stan... and you are still fighting against it, take a look above, even with your own "PER 36" criteria....
Quote:
|
He should be number 1 in the rankings based on all standards they've placed in the past
|
I have yet to see such past placed standards that would catapult Carmelo over Durant....
Quote:
|
PS - You're an idiot, and you don't know shit about basketball.
|
Well, that idiot that knows shit about basketball once again exposed you and your agenda......... Care to continue exposing yourself? Then please respond...
Keep in mind that you are not arguing against me, but you are arguing against reason, logic and facts.... which is why you will be losing this discussion all the time...