Message Board Basketball Forum - InsideHoops

Go Back   Message Board Basketball Forum - InsideHoops > InsideHoops Main Basketball Forums > Off the Court Lounge

Off the Court Lounge Basketball fans talk about everything EXCEPT basketball here

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-30-2007, 09:11 PM   #1
IBLEEDGREEN43
Local High School Star
 
IBLEEDGREEN43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Lakes Region, New Hampshire
Posts: 768
IBLEEDGREEN43 has no real reputation yet.
Default OT- Iran Responsible For Deadly Ambush Of US Troops In Iraq

this is gonna be very brutal if we decide to do something about this.. i heard that bush would get them good if they got involved.. and they are walking a fine line.. they are gonna get screwed up, real bad

breaking news on cnn
IBLEEDGREEN43 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2007, 09:14 PM   #2
The Answer
National High School Star
 
The Answer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 1,573
The Answer has decent reputationThe Answer has decent reputation
Default Re: OT- Iran Responsible For Deadly Ambush Of US Troops In Iraq

link?
The Answer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2007, 09:16 PM   #3
XxNeXuSxX
The Master Debater
 
XxNeXuSxX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: UConn
Posts: 8,000
XxNeXuSxX has an incredible reputation hereXxNeXuSxX has an incredible reputation hereXxNeXuSxX has an incredible reputation hereXxNeXuSxX has an incredible reputation hereXxNeXuSxX has an incredible reputation hereXxNeXuSxX has an incredible reputation hereXxNeXuSxX has an incredible reputation here
Default Re: OT- Iran Responsible For Deadly Ambush Of US Troops In Iraq

Don't believe this bullsh*t. I'm already sure this is conspired by the CIA to have "reason", that is if it happened.
XxNeXuSxX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 07:54 PM   #4
nashforprez
Local High School Star
 
nashforprez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 460
nashforprez has an OK reputation so far
Default Re: OT- Iran Responsible For Deadly Ambush Of US Troops In Iraq

i cant stand conspiracy theories.
nashforprez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 07:56 PM   #5
Howard5Dirk41
Banned
 
Howard5Dirk41's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: aka Nowitzki41MFFL
Posts: 1,601
Howard5Dirk41 has an OK reputation so far
Default Re: OT- Iran Responsible For Deadly Ambush Of US Troops In Iraq

this is bad news.... world war 3 coming up
Howard5Dirk41 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 08:06 PM   #6
The_Masterplan
Banned
 
The_Masterplan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,266
The_Masterplan has an OK reputation so far
Default Re: OT- Iran Responsible For Deadly Ambush Of US Troops In Iraq

http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/meast/...ain/index.html

interesting
The_Masterplan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 08:20 PM   #7
Mahmoud
Decent playground baller
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 116
Mahmoud has an OK reputation so far
Default Re: OT- Iran Responsible For Deadly Ambush Of US Troops In Iraq

Quote:
Originally Posted by XxNeXuSxX
Don't believe this bullsh*t. I'm already sure this is conspired by the CIA to have "reason", that is if it happened.

Actually there is a lot of growing anti-Iran sentiment, not just in the US, but in the Middle East. Iran has had more responsibility in causing havoc in Iraq and arming terrorists, than any other nation. Saudi Arabia is prepared to crash oil prices just to help moderate Iran, then again, people inside Iran are already angry with the leadership and the President has been rebuked by the Iranian Congress and the one man who really runs that nation, the Ayatollah.
Mahmoud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 08:50 PM   #8
The_Masterplan
Banned
 
The_Masterplan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,266
The_Masterplan has an OK reputation so far
Default Re: OT- Iran Responsible For Deadly Ambush Of US Troops In Iraq

I doubt Congress will give Bush the funding for the war anyways.
Unless Iran is killing like 500 americans a day then no.
If it is just Iranian militia doing this then the iranian military should step in and try and stop it. If they dont then that might escalate tension between the US and Iran
The_Masterplan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 10:05 PM   #9
Mahmoud
Decent playground baller
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 116
Mahmoud has an OK reputation so far
Default Re: OT- Iran Responsible For Deadly Ambush Of US Troops In Iraq

Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Masterplan
I doubt Congress will give Bush the funding for the war anyways.
Unless Iran is killing like 500 americans a day then no.
If it is just Iranian militia doing this then the iranian military should step in and try and stop it. If they dont then that might escalate tension between the US and Iran

Well considering that the US Army has been rounding up members of Iran's top elite Military forces, its quite unlikely that this is some rebel faction. This is a reason why the Iranian president has become so unpopular recently, especially with their economy in shambles. The worst thing America could do would be to attack Iran, that would reinvigorate him and get him new support. As it is, if things run their course, they'll run him out of town shortly if things keep going downhill in Iran.
Mahmoud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 10:10 PM   #10
reppy
Apparently likes anime
 
reppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,183
reppy has an incredible reputation herereppy has an incredible reputation herereppy has an incredible reputation herereppy has an incredible reputation herereppy has an incredible reputation herereppy has an incredible reputation herereppy has an incredible reputation herereppy has an incredible reputation here
Default Re: OT- Iran Responsible For Deadly Ambush Of US Troops In Iraq

They've been planning this for ages. Don't be surprised. It has long been predicted that they'd want to go after Iran next. Probably Syria, too.

Imagine if Russia attacked us for funding the Afghan rebels. You know, the ones that turned into the Taliban and Al Qaeda.
reppy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 10:10 PM   #11
The_Masterplan
Banned
 
The_Masterplan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,266
The_Masterplan has an OK reputation so far
Default Re: OT- Iran Responsible For Deadly Ambush Of US Troops In Iraq

Is iran's economy really doing that bad? I dont believe that considering they are oil kings.
The_Masterplan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 10:19 PM   #12
reppy
Apparently likes anime
 
reppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,183
reppy has an incredible reputation herereppy has an incredible reputation herereppy has an incredible reputation herereppy has an incredible reputation herereppy has an incredible reputation herereppy has an incredible reputation herereppy has an incredible reputation herereppy has an incredible reputation here
Default Re: OT- Iran Responsible For Deadly Ambush Of US Troops In Iraq

Quote:
Originally Posted by IBLEEDGREEN43
this is gonna be very brutal if we decide to do something about this.. i heard that bush would get them good if they got involved.. and they are walking a fine line.. they are gonna get screwed up, real bad

breaking news on cnn

By the way, it's been said that Iran has 50,000 *****e martyrs ready and waiting. Perhaps spread throughout the entire world. Are you ready to deal with that?

A fictional account of what the future might look like if/when America attacks Iran:

Quote:
The tragedy that followed Hillary Clinton's bombing of Iran in 2009


In retaliation, suicide bombers trained by Tehran massacred civilians in Tel Aviv, London and New York

Timothy Garton Ash
Thursday April 20, 2006
The Guardian

May 7 2009 will surely go down in history alongside September 11 2001. "5/7", as it inevitably became known, saw massive suicide bombings in Tel Aviv, London and New York, as well as simultaneous attacks on the remaining western troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. Total casualties were estimated at around 10,000 dead and many more wounded. The attacks, which included the explosion of a so-called dirty bomb in London, were orchestrated by a Tehran-based organisation for "martyrdom-seeking operations" established in 2004. "5/7" was the Islamic Republic of Iran's response to the bombing of its nuclear facilities, which President Hillary Clinton had ordered in March 2009.

Article continues
Despite massive protests across the Islamic world, and in many European capitals, the US-led military operation had initially appeared to be successful. The US, supported by British and Israeli special forces, had bombed 37 sites, including underground facilities in which Iran was said to be on the verge of making a nuclear weapon using its own version of P-2 centrifuges. The model for these had been originally supplied by AQ Khan, the rogue Pakistani nuclear scientist. US forces had taken down Iran's air defences and destroyed much of its air force. Inevitably, there were civilian casualties - estimated by the Iranian government at 197 dead and 533 injured. A Pentagon spokesman insisted that "collateral damage" had been confined to "an acceptable level". He claimed Iran's nuclear weapons programme had been "knocked back to first base".

The US navy had also successfully broken an attempted Iranian naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, one of the main arteries of the world's oil supplies. A US gunship had been damaged by an Iranian underwater missile attack, but with no loss of American lives. In panic on the oil markets, the price of crude oil had soared to more than $100 a barrel, but the Bush administration had built up America's strategic oil reserves and the new Clinton administration was able to draw on these. European economies were worse hit.

As experts had predicted, however, the biggest challenge for the west was Iran's ability to wage asymmetric warfare through Hizbullah, Hamas and its own suicide-bombing brigades. The Islamic Republic had for years been openly recruiting suicide bombers through an organisation described as the Committee to Commemorate Martyrs of the Global Islamic Movement. As early as April 2006, it had held a recruitment fair in the grounds of the former US embassy in Tehran, claiming it already had more than 50,000 volunteers for operations against "the al-Quds occupiers" (that is, Israel), "the occupiers of Islamic lands", especially the US and Britain, and the British writer Salman Rushdie. Recruits could also sign up through the internet (www.esteshhad.com) While Hizbullah and Hamas provided the infrastructure for the Tel Aviv bombings, the key to the attacks on London and New York was the recruitment of British and American Muslims through this group. The man who detonated the dirty bomb at Euston station, Bradford-born Muhammad Hussein, had been secretly trained by the Committee to Commemorate Martyrs at a camp in northern Iran.

With hindsight, it appears that the turning point may have come in the spring of 2006. Iran's president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, having proclaimed his intention to wipe Israel off the face of the earth, announced that his country had already successfully enriched uranium and hinted that it had the superior P-2 centrifuge technology. Whether true or not, these claims effectively destroyed the last hopes of achieving a diplomatic solution through negotiations led by the so-called E3 - France, Germany and Britain.

A long, tortuous diplomatic dance followed, with China and Russia eventually agreeing to minimal UN sanctions on Iran, including visa bans on selected members of the regime. These had little perceptible impact on the Iranian nuclear programme, but were successfully exploited by the regime to stoke up an always strong national sense of victimisation. Meanwhile, the exposure of the clumsy channelling of US government financial support through a California-based monarchist exile organisation to a student group in Isfahan was used as a pretext for a brutal clampdown on all potentially dissident groups. Several show trials for "treason" were staged despite international protests. This produced a further hardening of US policy in the last years of the Bush administration. In the 2008 US presidential campaign, the Democratic candidate, Hillary Clinton, felt compelled - perhaps against her own better judgment - to use the Iran issue to demonstrate that she could be tougher than John McCain on national security issues.

When she came into office, she was already committed to preventing Iran obtaining a nuclear weapon, by military means if necessary. Meanwhile, the Iranian regime had abandoned all restraint in its pursuit of that objective, calculating that its own best chances of survival lay in the swiftest possible acquisition of a nuclear deterrent. In February 2009, an alarming intelligence report reached Washington, suggesting that Tehran - using a secret cascade of its version of the P-2 centrifuge - was much closer to obtaining a bomb than had been thought. In a series of crisis meetings, President Clinton, her new secretary of state, Richard Holbrooke, and her new secretary of defence, Joe Biden, decided that they could afford to wait no longer. Operation Gulf Peace, for which the Pentagon had long made detailed contingency plans, started on March 6 2009.

Washington claimed that it had legal authorisation under earlier UN security council resolutions sanctioning Iran for its non-compliance on the nuclear issue, but these claims were disputed by China and Russia. Most European countries did not back the operation either, producing another big transatlantic rift. However, under enormous pressure from his close friends among US Democrats, the British prime minister, Gordon Brown, reluctantly decided to give it his approval, and allowed the token deployment of a small number of British special forces in a supporting role. This provoked a revolt from the Labour backbenches - led by the former foreign secretary, Jack Straw - and a demonstration of more than 1 million people in London. Even the Conservative leader, David Cameron, mindful that a general election was expected soon, criticised Brown's support for the American action. Brown therefore postponed the British election, which had been provisionally scheduled for May 2009. Instead of an election, the country experienced a tragedy.

Meanwhile, President Ahmadinejad faced a presidential election in June 2009. Unlike Brown, he was riding high on a wave of national solidarity. Even the many millions of Iranians disappointed by his failure to deliver on his material promises, and those who despaired of their country's international isolation, felt impelled to rally round the leader in time of war.

Many prominent Americans criticised the US military action. Some claimed to know that the presidential spouse, Bill Clinton, was privately among those critics, although in public he was loyalty itself. But Dr Patrick Smith of the Washington-based Committee for a Better World, which had long advocated bombing Iran, demanded of the critics: "What was your alternative?"

http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/st...757027,00.html
reppy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 10:20 PM   #13
reppy
Apparently likes anime
 
reppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,183
reppy has an incredible reputation herereppy has an incredible reputation herereppy has an incredible reputation herereppy has an incredible reputation herereppy has an incredible reputation herereppy has an incredible reputation herereppy has an incredible reputation herereppy has an incredible reputation here
Default Re: OT- Iran Responsible For Deadly Ambush Of US Troops In Iraq

Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Masterplan
Is iran's economy really doing that bad? I dont believe that considering they are oil kings.

I read an article that said they don't have much oil, and that their oil pipelines are really poor and they're losing a LOT of money. So, they do "need" the nuclear power. Granted, any smart person doesn't want them to have it. Hell, I don't want nuclear ANYTHING ANYWHERE.
reppy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 10:36 PM   #14
eboloid
Flash Gordo
 
eboloid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: (FOLLOW THE BONG NOISES)
Posts: 378
eboloid has an OK reputation so far
Default Re: OT- Iran Responsible For Deadly Ambush Of US Troops In Iraq

Everybody's asking me what'll happen if we attack Iran. To get a quick preview, just do what this guy in my eighth-grade class did: put a firecracker in your mouth, hold it between your front teeth, and light the fuse.
eboloid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2007, 02:49 AM   #15
Mahmoud
Decent playground baller
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 116
Mahmoud has an OK reputation so far
Default Re: OT- Iran Responsible For Deadly Ambush Of US Troops In Iraq

Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Masterplan
Is iran's economy really doing that bad? I dont believe that considering they are oil kings.


Their economy is horrible. The country is going through unbelievable poverty as most of that oil wealth is being squandered or looted by folks at the top of the government.

This is a recent article that talks about this issue->http://www.nysun.com/article/47772
Mahmoud is offline   Reply With Quote
This NBA Basketball News Website Sponsored by:
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:43 PM.




NBA Basketball Forum Key Links:
InsideHoops Home
NBA Rumors
Basketball Blog
NBA Daily Recaps
NBA Videos
Fantasy Basketball
NBA Mock Draft
NBA Free Agents
All-Star Weekend
---
High School Basketball
Streetball
---
InsideHoops Twitter
Search Our Site













Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Terms of Use/Service | Privacy Policy