Much like last season numbers you didn't show how Bradford is better. What you did was show he is in the same tier as Stafford. If both were free agents its a coin toss to who u sign. If one was clearly better than the other then you wouldn't have that problem.
Win loss argument is stupid and you know it. I read your argument for Sam and don't walk away with Sauk g you are right Sam is better. Not shocking given how biased u are for Sam ranking him amongst the top 10.
Perhaps not by much = nitpicking trying to find a way to say Sam > Stafford.
Lame tactic. Look at career numbers or did you overlook them because they don't side with Bradford? And even that goes back to my point that there is no significant gap between the two to crown either better than the other outside of personal preference.
We can assume what Bradford would do in Detroit. I think Michael Vick would excel and be a much better QB in NE. He'd arguably be the best in the NFL. If you feel Bradford would fare much better than Stafford in Detroit? Solid. Not sure what the point is there besides you like Bradford better than Stafford.
Rivers has been in a funk compared to his "prime" years for two years now, and it wouldn't surprise me in the least to see him return to the production he once had if they can protect him. The point is he has done it.
Stafford had a down year last year....but he's already proven to put up some insane numbers and helped his team to the playoffs. Bradford has done....neither.
Stafford & Bradford are of the same tier. Both are talented, but both have something to prove - Stafford needs to prove 2011 wasn't a fluke, and Bradford needs to prove he can be productive and help his team win now that he has the appropriate weapons around him (Tavon, great TE duo, Givens, solid line, great defense)
Carbine what he did that season (41td playoffs) is irrelevant. Its about LAST season. Got that bud?
Originally Posted by -p.tiddy-
if we are talking about who is better CURRENTLY, then we should look at recent stats, as in last season...this is a what-have-you-done-for-me-lately league when QBs are the subject
you brought up Vick, well when we rank Vick we don't point at his stats from 3 years ago...we look at what he did LAST YEAR
No my Vick toss in was for this reason. you said if Bradford was in Detroit he would do x, y and z and we wouldnt even debate who is better between Stafford and Bradford. To me thats a weak argument to use in this discussion.
But you did the Bradford in Detroit bit because of this...
but hey, how ever you want to reach in order to look correct
Irony much? Because that applies to you my friend. Not me.
We both agree Stafford has been overrated. We disagree on how good YOU feel Bradford is. I dont think Bradford is a bad QB or a limited QB ala Alex Smith. As I said he has to prove himself no different than Stafford. Carbine touched on it a bit with his recent reply.
When it comes to Bradford you think highly of him which is what prompted me to ask you initially what makes him better than Stafford. There is no winner or loser here. This was just for you to reveal how you break down which QB is better for me to understand your comment. Follow?
I read your support for Bradford > Stafford and walk away not convinced. Not out of spite its just nothing convincing me to feel that way. Would love both to prove themselves. I think Bradford is on a better team now than he ever has been.