Well one statistic, actually. Triples. Not how many. Not the player or team with the most, but the years in which they were most prevalent.
Unlike Hits, Doubles, HRs, RBIs and even Stolen Bases - Triples are the least common among batting results (with the exception of in-the-park homeruns, naturally).
Different eras, different styles of play I suppose? As you look at the list above, what immediately stands out is the years in which these players played. Legends such as Sam Crawford and Ty Cobb top the list. Both started and ended their professional careers within ten years of one another. The majority of the players listed started and finished their careers in earlier eras of the sport.
In fact, ranking at 56 on the list, Willie Wilson finished his career in 1994 (147 triples), and the latest before him some guy named Enos Slaughter who completed his in 1959 (148 triples). A more familiar name, George Brett, is 70th on the list with with 137 triples and retired in 1993. The controversial Pete Rose ranks 74th, career ended in '86.
As the list advances, you see more later entries to the sport - Robin Yount retired '93, Paul Molitor '98, Garry Templeton '91, Juan Samuel. Not until the 90th position do you see someone retired post the year 2000. As follows, Steve Finley '07, Lance Johnson '00, Kenny Lofton (one of my favorite players growing up) '07, Tim Raines '02 and Johnny Damon '12.
With the vast majority of triples coming from players in the earlier eras of baseball, can this be attributed to better offense / weaker defense? A different breed of athlete that coincides with the times? Different player culture, different style of play?