Originally Posted by Psycho
In what way? I think empowering women so the can participate equally in society as men without extra burdens and restraints is a just, and worthwhile cause.
It is a just and worthy cause.
It is the very definition of equality that we Americans toss around.
And a woman shouldn't be freakin judged only on the fact if she can make a good housewife, and "Zomg u dont have ze family or ze ring u must sux0rz". She has many gifts to offer and God bless the ladies in Healthcare and Business who hold it down.
But there are many consequences that went down that fukked things over.
1) Dating Inequality
For the most part leading up to the 1930s or so, most men had wives and worked to become decent productive members of society. Now that the tables have turned and women are allowed jobs they only crave a certain type of man at the top and crave them even more if it's taken. That's the nature of their desire unless it's combated with Conscious Will. To the winners goes the spoils and the spoils. The problem with this is it leaves a great proportion of men sexually frustrated and well; the repercussions are not good.
2) Abuse of power.
A husband has to attain a wife's permission to get a vasectomy, and feminists push to banning paternity tests. A woman has autonomy if she wants to keep or abort a child.
You want a reovlution and instability? Many sons, many guns.
3) Dual income households are often REQUIRED to sustain a family financially. And this iwll lead to less bonding between mother and child. The State becomes the child's parent figuratively speaking.
4) It is theoretically impossible to apply EYE for an EYE, LIVE and die by the sword EQUAL justice to women. Our human nature and emotional makeup will simply not allow for it. And with this you can already see social stigmas coming from:
Older teachers sleeping with younger. And it's respective double standards.
In the military, are you going to keep the same standards for physical fitness. It's impossible. A male's latissimus dorsi and biceps brachialis possess far stronger contractile muscle fibers and he has smaller hips. This will lead to more pull-ups from the get go. It would be a better choice to recruit a subpar male who still beats out the good female in the battlefield, and forcing quotas often results in a slight nullification of meritocracy.
5) Many women flat out can not have a high quality husband. Thousands are frustrated iin agony at the amount of guys who just pump and dump them or flat out don't hav ethe balls to charm them. Prior to 1930, the average man had a blend of charm, strength, skill, and status that made him more or less attractive and capable of exercising chivalry. Now it's as if they have to settle for an alcoholic who beats them but fukks them well or they got to be bored out of their fukking wits with a goody two shoes high-earning engineer. Hence the bleating of "There are no good men left"
When you are rewarded with attention for being promiscuous and shamed for keeping them closed, guess what you're going to do as a girl?
When there has been no time in history where becoming a manipulative sunuvabich will get you poontang, guess what dudes incentives and intentions gonna be?
What does this lead to? Major disharmony and bitterness amongst the genders. The human race is already divided and have their freedoms severely restricted from a bunch of fukkwits. Do they really need male-female dissent to top it off?
*more to come*