The point is wanting less restriction in some areas doesn't mean wanting less restriction in all areas.
I was simply pointing out that good portions, not all, of the conservative base who fight gun control on the basis of freedom of choice also attack the right to gay marriage using similar methods to what they are fighting against.
nothing morally wrong with marrying your siblings or parents, it's just weird as effff. If you want to f)ck your dog and cat, then go right ahead. Sick f)ck.
The dog has to want it too, tho. Can't be no one way street. Cats, and even dogs, will also probably sustain some pretty bad internal damage unless you're packing a match box, so that's terrible animal abuse.
People are right that some deviancies are worst than others but as long as it doesn't infringe on other peoples rights I don't see a problem. For example, pedophilia is obviously an issue because our society has mandated that children under 16 are too young to make a conscious decision and are therefore sexually off limits.
There are some cultures, like in Pakistan for example, where marrying your cousin is completely acceptable. The problem is, it can lead to higher chance of complications with the kids, and in modern society that is problem that falls on society as a whole, it is also pretty cruel if you understand the medical science.
Two guys having sex or celebrating their union, infringes on nobody's rights. So what's the problem exactly? That it repulses you? So do fat people, heavily handicapped people, deformed people, stupid people, loud people, etc, etc.