Originally Posted by IGOTGAME
Well Zeke could take over games...had that special quality that great ones had...Stock never had it and thats why he never won any rings... and Zeke has 2 back to back
There's any number of reasons why Stock never won any rings -I put the Jazz failings in 2 finals on Malone more than Stock. Stock hit the 3 to give the Jazz game 6 and it was Malone's TO that set the Bulls up to win.
But just ot compare Stock with IT - Stock never had the front-line that those pistons teams had - few teams ever did. Its nice that IT could 'take over a game", but Stockton was a better defender and a better passer and a better shooter. IT was great and should be right around Stock but if you look at their careers, there is very little reason to put IT over Stock.
Something like that.