I can't see any of those as main eventers, but the best bets are on Big E (his real-life connection with Cena), Cesaro (one of the best worker in the business today), and Roman Reigns (Samoan connection, looks).
Harper and Fandango are based on ability. These guys are really good.
im close to giving up on WWE. I'll see what happens with WM30, but for a long time fan that just got back into wrestling last year, I'm already tired of being let down by these guys..
they refuse to try anything different.
there is absolutly no ****ing payoff to ANY of their story lines
Cena finally gets beat clean and they..****ing waste it
HHH can **** off, enough with this passive aggressive "I'm a face for the first hour and a heel for the 2nd" pick your side of the fence and stick to it so i can get invested into the god damn story
the writing is so ****ing lazy and it's noticeable, this company clearly doesn't plan ANY story lines out ahead of time.
They build up guys like Daniel Bryan who becomes the most over face on the roster, have him go over Cena, win the title.. and what the payoff? They berade him for a month on RAW contantly re itterating the point that he is not to be taken seriously and that he is a "B+" player, this would have been fine if he ends up with the belt and comes out on top, but no, he gets "screwed over" 3 straight ppvs and then is forgotten about. WWE once again gets people invested into a character, just to shit on him and make us feel stupid for even being invested in the guy
How many times does the roof need to explode for Daniel Bryan & CM Punk before they take the spots of the supposed "fan favorite" who gets boo'd back to Boston at every single PPV and the guy with 2 strikes who has been given opportunity after opportunity and yet is still unable to garner any fan reaction outside of the soccer moms who think he's attractive..
****ING WWE you monopolizing bastards if another wrestling company had some good financial backing your ass would on the brink of bankruptcy just like in 95.
Many were surprised that the CM Punk vs. Brock Lesnar match at this year's SummerSlam wasn't nominated for the "Match of the Year" in the 2013 WWE Slammy Awards. According to reports, several people within WWE feel that it is easily the best match in the entire company for 2013.
According to one source, the reason Punk vs. Lesnar was not nominated is because Punk "can't have a better match" with Lesnar than Triple H did, so WWE nominated the Lesnar vs. Triple H match instead, and gave Punk the nomination for his match against The Undertaker at WrestleMania 29 instead.
I get HHH has a huge ego but I don't buy it completely . I think it has more to do with lesnar having to sign a new contract after Mania and him being a candidate twice would make him want even more money. I think it's a little bit of both.
It is kinda weird that Cena ended up standing beside Triple H, Steph and Corporate Kane while Triple H's boy Randy Orton got Pedigree'd lying away alone, all of that while people were still chanting "DANIEL BRYAN!".
Last nights ending was amazing but lets see where it goes.
Exactly what I was thinking. There's no way AJ lost to the Bellas on that poll. AJ's whole heel run has had fans chanting her name and the Bellas whole "face" run has been boos and silence. Plus last night they got booed out of the arena when they won