Official #11 Dunker Of All Time According To ISH

[Noob Saibot]

Spud Webb, the little man that could.

[G-train]

who in their f#cking right mind thinks Daryl Dawkins is a better dunker than Shaq?
Shaq did more great dunks in his rookie season alone than Dawkins in his whole career.

in general this board is as dumb as dogsh!t

my vote - shaq

[StroShow4]

Originally Posted by dirkdiggler41

So what if he is not a good overall player. He is not a less of dunker even so. Thats like saying that Steve Kerr was never a good 3 point shooter becaus he lacked the overall skill.

This is about nba after what I understand. So no and1...

thats not what i was talking about. i am saying he didnt do enough great in game dunks to be the 11th greatest dunker of all time. in game>>>>>>>>>dunk contest.

[AirGordon7]

Originally Posted by G-train

who in their f#cking right mind thinks Daryl Dawkins is a better dunker than Shaq?
Shaq did more great dunks in his rookie season alone than Dawkins in his whole career.

in general this board is as dumb as dogsh!t

my vote - shaq

HAVE YOU EVEN SEEN A CHOCOLATE THUNDER DUNK!!! Shaqs dunks are all the same and he doesnt even get up that high. Dawkins had so much creativity with his dunks and he dunked harder than anyone I have ever seen.

[AirGordon7]

Larry Nance

[DirtBag]

Tom chambers for number 11!!!!

[mhg88]

Spud Webb

[wally_world]

Dee Brown!

the old school one... not that guy with the cornrows...

[dawsey6]

Originally Posted by StroShow4

spud shouldnt be on this list. not even top 50. he lacks too much in the in game department, and if dunk contests matter so much that air up there guy from and1 should be considered because he can do a 360 between the legs and a 720.

Why wouldn't a dunk contest count towards a list of the greatest dunkers of all-time? It's a contest where your true prowess as a dunker should show--all your creativity, style, and athletism. If anything, a dunk contest should count more, because anyone 6' 6" could dunk in a game, and if you're a further, more gifted dunker, then I'm pretty sure if you're 6' 6" and over you could dunk over anyone at once with a good first step.

Given he has dunked in games as well, how could you knock him for lacking in the "in-game" department? The guy's 5' 7". Logic should tell anyone he's not going to go for as many dunks as someone Jordan's height, or Thompson's height. If that's really your concern, then you should ask anyone 5' 7" anywhere to dunk as much as Josh Smith or Jason Richardson in the NBA (not in some And-1 game). The height advantage is so unfair it's ridiculous. This guy is just as legit a dunker as anyone (and, side note, he's a much better dunker than Nate Robinson, so don't compare the two just because he's 5' 9").

Spud Webb

[G-train]

Originally Posted by AirGordon7

HAVE YOU EVEN SEEN A CHOCOLATE THUNDER DUNK!!! Shaqs dunks are all the same and he doesnt even get up that high. Dawkins had so much creativity with his dunks and he dunked harder than anyone I have ever seen.

Yes I have. Have you seen shaq dunk?
I can guarentee you a highlight package of shaq's rookie year will contain more impressive dunks (creativity is not the only factor in a dunk) than a highligh reel of Dawkins whole career.
Dawkins was impressive for his time, but Shaq took power dunking to another level. Your either stupid or lack understanding if u dont see that.
Amare Stoudemire is a more powerful and impressive dunker than Dawkins.

LOL at the notion Dawkins dunked harder than shaq.