"Walt Frazier and Earl Monroe were my guards when I came to New York, and Walt had busted a lot of people. But to quote boxing referee, Joe Cortez, 'I will try to be fair, but firm.'”
Re: Walt Frazier vs. Jason Kidd--- Spencer Haywood's Analysis
What the hell do best dressed, media friendliness, and popularity have to do with anything. Haywood's gone senile...dude said he would average 75 ppg and 50 rpg in todays game:
Re: Walt Frazier vs. Jason Kidd--- Spencer Haywood's Analysis
Quote:
Originally Posted by eliteballer
What the hell do best dressed, media friendliness, and popularity have to do with anything. Haywood's gone senile...dude said he would average 75 ppg and 50 rpg in todays game:
Re: Walt Frazier vs. Jason Kidd--- Spencer Haywood's Analysis
Yeah, Walt Frazier was better than Jason Kidd. As for passing and playmaking, Frazier was more than enough, but he was also a genuine scoring threat. He was also a better defensive player than Kidd, and Kidd is an excellent defensive player. Frazier could score and make key plays in the clutch, while Kidd has tried to up his scoring in the playoffs.
I think Frazier's new-money fashion flaunting was immature, but on the court, he was a completely different and mature leader.
"Walt Frazier and Earl Monroe were my guards when I came to New York, and Walt had busted a lot of people. But to quote boxing referee, Joe Cortez, 'I will try to be fair, but firm.'”
CATEGORIES
Offensive Edge FRAZIER
Defensive Edge FRAZIER
Passing Edge KIDD
Intangibles * FRAZIER
Versatility FRAZIER
Dependability in big games FRAZIER
Ability to make their teammates better KIDD
Court Vision KIDD
Maturity FRAZIER
Basketball IQ
TIE
Head to Head FRAZIER
Most Coachable
TIE
Better Ball Handler KIDD
Quicker KIDD
Those are the only categories that matter and honestly Kidd is better in the most important ones. Passing, ball handling, court vision, quickness, and making his teamates better are probably the 5 most important attributes in a point guard. Unless he is arguing for Kidd this is a bad way to prove his point.
Re: Walt Frazier vs. Jason Kidd--- Spencer Haywood's Analysis
there is no way Kidd is quicker than Clyde. Clyde was like a cat. great athlete. Kidd has quick hands but not quicker feet.
I won't get into categories but Frazier was a better player than Kidd. There are IMO only two guys that have played the PG position you could argue as being better than Frazier and that's Magic and Isiah. The man is mad underrated.
Re: Walt Frazier vs. Jason Kidd--- Spencer Haywood's Analysis
Quote:
Originally Posted by allball
there is no way Kidd is quicker than Clyde. Clyde was like a cat. great athlete. Kidd has quick hands but not quicker feet.
I won't get into categories but Frazier was a better player than Kidd. There are IMO only two guys that have played the PG position you could argue as being better than Frazier and that's Magic and Isiah. The man is mad underrated.
i never really saw walt except for in the game 7 blowout against the lakers where he looks like the best player ever. anybody older than me wanna give a basic description of what his play style was and why he should be ranked this high? i guess i kind of have a slightly better dennis johnson in my head when i think about him but i would never have thought to rank him over stockton or cousy.
Re: Walt Frazier vs. Jason Kidd--- Spencer Haywood's Analysis
Quote:
Originally Posted by allball
there is no way Kidd is quicker than Clyde. Clyde was like a cat. great athlete. Kidd has quick hands but not quicker feet.
I won't get into categories but Frazier was a better player than Kidd. There are IMO only two guys that have played the PG position you could argue as being better than Frazier and that's Magic and Isiah. The man is mad underrated.
He is underrated
But ever heard of Oscar Robertson, John Stockton, Bob Cousy, and Gary Payton?