Phi @ind - Page 2 - Message Board Basketball Forum

The Big Three · 12-19-2007, 10:39 PM

How good do you think Dunleavy could potentially be? Consistent 20 ppg scorer?

jbot · 12-19-2007, 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Big Three

How good do you think Dunleavy could potentially be? Consistent 20 ppg scorer?

possibly. he's really got a groove going lately. i hope he keeps it up.

hey, isn't it your bedtime, kid?

don't make me email your parents!!!

catzhernandez · 12-19-2007, 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Big Three

How good do you think Dunleavy could potentially be? Consistent 20 ppg scorer?

I think he's a better second option, a GREAT second option. A consistent 18/7/5 kinda guy...

jbot · 12-19-2007, 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by catzhernandez

I think he's a better second option, a GREAT second option. A consistent 18/7/5 kinda guy...

man, i didn't realize he's pushing granger outta the spotlight. danny has been a little inconsistent as of late.

catzhernandez · 12-19-2007, 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jbot

man, i didn't realize he's pushing granger outta the spotlight. danny has been a little inconsistent as of late.

He has, he's also shown that he's not quite as clutch as I'd like for him to be either...

Miller Time · 12-20-2007, 04:35 PM

Nice win by us, 'Quis was great.

O'neal had 5 blocked shots which is also great.

Well there is not much to say, we played great and beat there fullcourt press like it was nothing there. Only thing I have to say is that Granger needs to get his shooting back and learn how to put in his layups.

oh and one other thing, we didnt have Tinsley (since he was injured), without Tinsley = less turnovers. But still we need him back, he just need to control himself, stop shooting so many crazy-shots and be more careful with his passes.

Good job Pacers

Miller Time · 12-20-2007, 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by catzhernandez

God, I'm so good it scares me. Aother close prediction by me here. We won 102-85.

I know this team like the back of my ****.

you know the Sixers, I know the Pacers :P I was closer with my 106 prediction for the Pacers.

catzhernandez · 12-20-2007, 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Miller Time

you know the Sixers, I know the Pacers :P I was closer with my 106 prediction for the Pacers.

PacerRaptor · 12-20-2007, 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jbot

how's this?:

SG: Willie "too short"Green
SF: Andre "gimme the ball kobe style" Iguodala
PF: Reggie "all i do is rebound and grab nuts" Evans
C: Samuel "not a natural canadian" Dalembert

is granger really gonna start at sg?
IND wins w/ one arm tied behind dunleavy's back.

i think Dunleavy is starting at SG and Granger is staying at SF...

catzhernandez · 12-20-2007, 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PacerRaptor

i think Dunleavy is starting at SG and Granger is staying at SF...

yeah, me too.

Miller Time · 12-20-2007, 07:15 PM

2 and 3 do almost the same thing anyway in Pacers offense, so it dosent matter. And on defense the just pick up the best matchup.

marny_navis · 12-20-2007, 07:15 PM

Loving it. PacerRaptor's bringing the brains to the board in game discussions that I sadly lack.

PacerRaptor · 12-20-2007, 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marny_navis

Loving it. PacerRaptor's bringing the brains to the board in game discussions that I sadly lack.

LOL thanks man...

The Big Three · 12-20-2007, 10:11 PM

We got another guy here? Sweetliness! This board's rockin' now!

jbot · 12-20-2007, 10:21 PM

yeah, pacerraptor has been MIA for a bit.