Starting Lineup (Based On Current Roster)

[B-Low]

So of course there's the Francis/Marbury debate, and then there's who to start at the 3, so my question is who do you think should start out of the current Knicks? In NBA Live at least here's the starters I put out

PG: Marbury
SG: Francis
SF: Richardson
PF: Frye
C: Curry

Sometimes I start Robinson in Marbury's place, so they're interchangable, and i SOMETIMES start Rose at the 3, but i like bringing him off the bench since he can play anything from the 1-3, so i just put him in if someone else is in foul trouble or struggling. How bout you guys?

[thenextgreatbigman]

I'd love to see

nate
crawford
lee
frye
curry

these guys would play hard and work off of each other. might be young and inexperienced but they would be very energetic. (especially nate and lee)

**** marbury/francis/richardson and a few more guys that i don't have time to mention

[The REAL Next KNICK]

pg- marbury
sg- crawford
sf- q rich
pf- frye
c-curry

[datdude]

actually, i would love to see Q start at the 2. If he starts posting up players and slashing like he did in LA versus jacking up 3's, he could create some serious matchup problems. I dont see stevie hanging around too much longer, trust me

1-Marbs
2-Q
3-Lee (hopefully)/woods
4-Frye
5-Curry

[brooklynchild155]

1:marbury
2:francis
3:lee
4:fyre
5:curry

[The REAL Next KNICK]

to me crawford is a starting because what he did at the end of last year, q at the 3 and lee curyr marbury

[datdude]

Originally Posted by The REAL Next KNICK

to me crawford is a starting because what he did at the end of last year, q at the 3 and lee curyr marbury

exactly, because of what he did last year he should definantly stay a 6th man. he gave instance offense off the bench, chose better shot selections, and was a overall smarter player. true he played well when steph was "hurt", but i LOVED him coming off the bench. I could see him competing for 6th man OTY this year

[JinTheWindMaster]

PG-Marbury
SG-Crawford
SF-Lee
PF-Frye
C-Curry

[Da KO King]

pg- marbury
sg- francis
sf- q rich
pf- frye
c-curry

Let Crawford be the first man off the bench anchoring the second unit.

[Michael_Who?]

because of the big names, this will be the anticipated line up..

pg-Marbury
sg-Francis
sf-Richardson
pf-Frye
C-Curry

but IMO, I think it should be

pg-Marbury
sg-Quiten Richardson
sf-Jalen Rose
pf-David Lee
c-Channing Frye/Eddie Curry

Unless Frye fully recovers from that knee incident late this year, I believe he can make it to the starting line up. anyone has news on him?

Question.. if the Knicks are in a rebuilding process, why do they have two novice centers, Frye and Curry? Wouldn't it be hard to develop two unique Foward/Centers? Just wonderin..

[datdude]

Originally Posted by Michael_Who?

Question.. if the Knicks are in a rebuilding process, why do they have two novice centers, Frye and Curry? Wouldn't it be hard to develop two unique Foward/Centers? Just wonderin..

actually, frye is playing pf. they are trying to develop him into a garnett/J oneil type player. we have this other fellow backing up curry at center named jerome james.