Originally Posted by canadianballer
The spurs are not a dynasty in my eyes. Yes they won 3 titles in 5 years, but never back to back and in my opinion if you can't even repeat 1 time that isn't a true dynasty
Agreed. The Spurs are an overrated team in recent years and my points are listed below:
First of all, I don't need to explain what happened to the title they won in 1999 since everyone knows it was considerably overrated.
Second, the Spurs were facing a Lakers team with severely injured Shaq in 2nd round in 2003. Besides, Dirk Nowitzki was horribly injured as well in WCF so the Mavs lost all their home games to the Spurs(Ironically the Mavs did win 2 road games).
At last, it was surely lucky for the Spues to won the title in 2007 since the Mavs(Who were capable of beating the Spurs in 5) were defeated by GS and the Suns had to play game 5 w/o Amare and Diaw. On the other hands, who knows what might happen in NBA final if the Pistons weren't upset by the Cavs?
In a word, the Spurs deserved to win merely a title in 2005. Their situation is just the same as the Houston Rockets in 1994-1995. But man, the Rockets at least repeated once, didn't they?