The 2006 draft was pretty limited. Getting Aldridge was a nice score. I'm not sure how much potential he has to get a lot better than he already is, though
i think the blazer's were angry that they had lost their title of being the nba's most f'd up franchise to the knicks, so they are know on a crusade to regain their thrown.
I read old posts... don't say dumb things or I'll dig them up and make fun of you
I personally thought the first post was the worst. Talking about how dumb it was to pick aldridge when we could have had Morrison, and how "Maglorie" and Randolph are going to be the future and will not be traded. Hindsight is always 20/20 of course, but it is still funny just how wrong that guy was. Everything he said turned out to be wrong, lol.
Nope. I want the Blazers to steer clear of Marion, his contract, and not liking being the 3rd or 4th man in the spotlight.
yea but you get a trading peice and if you dont trade him you will be able to sign a big contract????beside if greg is as good as he is suppose to be you wont be as needed as much. and marion is a verstisle player that will be good with you guys
yea but you get a trading peice and if you dont trade him you will be able to sign a big contract????beside if greg is as good as he is suppose to be you wont be as needed as much. and marion is a verstisle player that will be good with you guys
yea but you get a trading peice and if you dont trade him you will be able to sign a big contract????beside if greg is as good as he is suppose to be you wont be as needed as much. and marion is a verstisle player that will be good with you guys
Why would we trade for a trading piece? That doesn't make much sense.
I'm with Myth on this one - Marion is ego-baggage - he couldn't be happy playing with Steve Nash and Amare Stoudemire??? Reminds me of the story i read yesterday that Stephen Jackson wants a contract extention because he can't see himself going into next season as the 5th highest player on his own team. Little b^^^h!!!!
