Originally Posted by MarloStanfield
Prime just to clarify you mean AP right?
What I am saying is that good teams have schemes/systems already in place. It's about finding players and developing them to fit your scheme. That's what teams like the Patriots/Colts/Eagles do well. They build through the draft.
Believe it or not the Eagles wouldn't be as proficient offensively if you exchanged Westbrook for Peterson. The same holds true for the other way around. The Eagles offense is built around 36. Peterson doesn't have the blocking abilities or skills as a WR (that's not to say he never will but he doesn't at the moment). The Eagles flat out are a better team with Westbrook than they would be with Peterson.
Well as a Dallas fan your entitled to your opinion. I personally believe you severely undervalue Westbrook and don't understand how truly versatile or well rounded of a football player he is.
Originally Posted by -primetime-
AD = "All Day"
and I guess we will have to agree to disagree...
until you see Peterson's stats at the end of this year....:)
wow Marlo was just real noobish in this thread...
This whole thread was basically him trying to convince me that Westbrook is better than Peterson...and that Peterson wouldn't work in Philly...
he had never heard "AD" before either...he thought it was a typo...