Message Board Basketball Forum - InsideHoops

Go Back   Message Board Basketball Forum - InsideHoops > InsideHoops Main Basketball Forums > G League Forum, Minor League and International Basketball Forum

G League Forum, Minor League and International Basketball Forum G League Forum, Minor League and world international basketball forum

Thread Tools
Old 08-01-2008, 07:36 PM   #16
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 13,300
Default Re: New euroleague proposals,for or against?

Originally Posted by la bomba
The euroleague wants to have 18 permanent teams with the other 6 qualifying.I think this would lead to a more NBA like closed league.I think it would be wrong.It would be a bad thing for competition in the domestic leagues.Money is starting to talk.teams are spending too much and can't afford not to qualify for the euroleague.Would the 18 teams be the best or the most financially equipped?Please Bartomeu think about it.

I don't like the idea. Then it's a real "league" instead of a representation of a true assortment of the best teams
insidehoops is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2009, 09:57 PM   #17
Taras Bulba
Learning to shoot layups
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 89
Default Re: New euroleague proposals,for or against?

Time for an update as Euroleague decided for a new plan:

Euroleague clubs and representatives of national leagues met today in the Italian capital to advance debate on the strategic plan for the 2009-12 period that was first presented in Berlin in July 2008.

An evolution of this plan was presented that would permit a greater consensus across Europe and would allow for greater participation from teams and national leagues that do not currently have access to the competition.

The proposal was supported by 20 clubs and 3 of the leagues represented in Tuesday’s meeting where an agreement on the direction of the proposal presented was reached. Votes against the proposal came from 2 clubs and 2 leagues. This overwhelming consensus in favour of the strategic plan signifies another step towards creating the necessary stability for the continued positive growth of the Euroleague.

As part of these developments, the competition would consist of five phases: Qualifying Rounds, Regular Season, Top 16, Playoffs, and Final Four.

The proposal discussed would allow double the number of national champions to participate in the top European competition compared to the current format, by opening the Euroleague up to 30 teams when including the Qualifying Rounds.

* The Qualifying Rounds would be played by 8 teams, of which 2 would qualify for the Regular Season.
* The Regular Season would be played by 24 teams: 13 having long-term A Licences, 10 having one-year B Licences (including the 2 teams from the Qualifying Rounds), and the Eurocup champion having a one-year C Licence. This will be revised and evaluated in the summer of 2012.
* The A Licences would go to the 13 top-ranked teams since the 2002-03 season, when the competition was consolidated with 24 teams per year, according to the following ranking parameters: 60% sports results, 30% TV income generated in their markets, and 10% arena attendance.
* The champions in at least 12 national leagues, if not more, would have their presence in the Euroleague guaranteed with the possibility of obtaining a one-year B Licence based solely on sports results in their domestic championships. The runners-up and third-place teams from three of the highest-rated national leagues according to a separate ranking would also have options to obtain a B Licence. If, however, a Euroleague team with an A Licence wins its domestic title, that place would not go directly to the same country's runner-up, but rather to the next country on the ranking of national leagues, thus permitting more opportunities among countries and clubs.
* The Eurocup champion would retain the current prize for winning that competition, namely a one-year C Licence. If a team qualifies as Eurocup champion and later wins its national championship, the team would go to the Euroleague as national champion and the Eurocup C Licence would become a wild card.

Euroleague Basketball assembly in RomeThe strategic plan included proposals for promoting the Euroleague and optimizing its economic resources, including the television coverage and commercial assets of the competition. A business plan was presented including specific economic objectives and investments. These were considered highly important.

Finally 23 out of the 30 members present agreed to create a Shareholders Executive Board formed by:

* President, Jordi Bertomeu, Euroleague Basketball CEO
* Asseco Prokom Sopot
* CSKA Moscow
* Efes Pilsen
* Maccabi Electra Tel Aviv
* Montepaschi Siena
* Olympiacos Piraeus
* Real Madrid
* Tau Ceramica
* ABA (Adriatic League)
* BBL (Germany)
* LEGA (Italy)
* LNB (France).

Basically the 13 teams that got long term (3 years) contracts till the 2012 are the following:

Real Madrid
Efes Pilsen
CSKA Moscow
Taras Bulba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2009, 12:40 PM   #18
Lakas Fan Yo
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,267
Default Re: New euroleague proposals,for or against?

Spain with 4 spots, Italy and Greece with 3, Turkey with 2, etc. That's all great, but I would rather have Russia with 3 and France with 1, instead of both France and Russia with 2.

Actually though, Eurocup winner is most likely every year to be from Greece, Spain, or Russia so I guess it evens out.
Lakas Fan Yo is offline   Reply With Quote
This NBA Basketball News Website Sponsored by:

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:00 AM.

InsideHoops Home
NBA Rumors
Basketball Blog
NBA Daily Recaps
NBA Videos
Fantasy Basketball
Search Site


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Terms of Use/Service | Privacy Policy