Originally Posted by PejaNowitzki
Lee for 65 million is a bargain. Statistically the guy is on the same level as Stoudemire but 35 million cheaper, younger and without the injury issues. In a season of ridiculous idiotic spending(see Outlaw, Salmons and more), Lee is a true bargain.
Whether or not he'll be a good fit with the Warriors is something else altogether but I don't see the issue here.
Amare is better than David Lee.
Amare and David Lee are both 27
This proposed deal is not a bargin. That would suggest David Lee was worth more. He's not.