Originally Posted by statman32
im sorry i misread your mumbo jumbo **** logic....its still the worst way to analyze players stats
oh and here are some of amares and cambys shooting stats from everything not under the basket
camby 60/161 37.2%
amare 50/134 37.3%
oh and heres their ft% since cambys range is so much better than amares
so amare actually has better range than camby i must say...weird...camby is nowhere near as good as amare on the offensive end if he doesnt even have better range than camby
Do you know what range is?