Originally Posted by ronniec
So, what's your point? Celtics made a risky move but the move makes a lot of sense and not insane as you are thinking. If they think they can compensate Perks' 9 points 9 rebounds per game from somewhere else; and getting 2 healthy players in return, what bad it is?
Don't pretend you know more than Ainge and the Celtics front office.
I don't need to pretend I know more than them.
It may have been 9 point and 9 rebounds, but the impact Perkins has on the defensive end of the floor is rivaled by very few big men.
I can already see Doc Rivers making excuses for why they lost.