Originally Posted by bokes15
The thing is, it's not like Beasley would've been a financially crippling piece anyways. Worst case scenario, we would've dished out about 10M total for the 10-11 and 11-12 season and at that point either decide if he's worth it, and if not cut him or trade him. At this point I don't really care anymore that we don't have Beasley but I wouldn't have been against the move.
I think the only factor/reason for BC not to accept Beasley onto the team, is because of his personality. He wasn't really a hard worker and he has already been to rehab before the age of 24. He probably didn't want him to influence the younger players on the team and set a bad example. that's my take.