Originally Posted by StateOfMind12
See I don't understand this logic because since when was not making the Finals better than making the Finals?
I understand if you want to give Lebron a blackmark for his 2011 Finals but why his 2007 Finals?
Nobody expected him to go there and nobody really even expected him and his team to compete in that series. It is serious revisionist history to blame Lebron for his 2007 Finals loss.
Jordan's resume is practically perfect but my GOAT ranking is not based on resume/accomplishments. It is based on how good you are and Lebron could very well be better than MJ ever was.
yeah I never understood Jordan stan logic when it comes to this...
Lebron leads his team to the Finals at 22 years old....but loses
Jordan leads his team to a Losing record.....and gets swept
Jordan stan logic = that means Jordan is better because he never lost in the Finals..