Re: Top Ten Running Backs of the Millennium
any time a RB goes for 1,000+ and stays healthy 16 games that is above average to me...
if those are his 3 worst years then holy shit...
Campbell had a stronger prime, but it was short...Curtis played twice as long, has double the numbers...yes that means something
btw, go look at some of the average years for Earl
Aside from Earl, because that is really a prime vs. longevity debate...Martin should certainly be ranked above Gale Sayers all time.