Originally Posted by -p.tiddy-
it's not about my expectations for of above average...that IS above average
and like I said, if those are his three worst years, then holy fckin shit...I can dig up 3 much worse years from Earl
and prime Shaq is a horrible comparison, that would mean that Earl was slamming home rings every year...it was cheating almost...but that wasn't the case at all.
If football was like basketball where one player can have an immense impact on a game, then yes you're rebuttle would have some merrit, although it would still be dumb. Shaq didn't win titles by himself, he did have Kobe, Phil Jackson and others that helped his cause.
Earl was a running back playing football. His dominance alone couldn't translate into rings.