Originally Posted by niko
No he didn't. There is no ****ing way unless it was by a member of the Dallas Media who was related to his GF of the moment. and before you think i'm hating that is 2007. ONE person got MVP recognition in 2007. ONE person got 49 out of 50 votes. One person got a sickening amount of attention until we burst their bubble in the Super Bowl.
okay if Tomlinson or Brady ran away with it that year then fine...but let's not act like Romo has never been considered good
it is irrelevant to my point any way...not sure why Nanners needs Romo to be an "MVP" in order for the comparison to work, it means nothing to the point